OJAS Home

2020 - Volume 4 - Number 1

Performative Hybridity of Informal Initiatives Helping Refugees: A Way of Resistance

Mario Rodríguez Polo * mario.rodriguez@upol.cz
Palacký University Olomouc, Department of Sociology, Andragogy and Cultural Anthropology, CZECH REPUBLIC

Jaroslav Šotola * jaroslav.sotola@upol.cz * ORCID: 0000-0002-6430-7234
Palacký University Olomouc, Department of Sociology, Andragogy and Cultural Anthropology, CZECH REPUBLIC

Open Journal for Anthropological Studies, 2020, 4(1), 1-14 * https://doi.org/10.32591/coas.ojas.0401.01001p
Received: 4 December 2019 ▪ Accepted: 20 January 2020 ▪ Published Online: 25 January 2020

LICENCE: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ARTICLE (Full Text - PDF)

ABSTRACT:
The so-called “refugee crisis” has challenged establishment putting its capacities under question as the image of a chaotic situation prevailed over European Union and its member states intervention. Formal civil society and big transnational humanitarian institutions also became the target of the critics of a heterogeneous public. Present work argues that current forms of civil engagement, manifested for example in informal initiatives helping refugees, locate their efforts under an umbrella of decolonization of their own societies. Participants in informal initiatives produce with their actions a discourse of outrage, preferentially channelized through direct action approaches, which persecutes the creation of an emancipative alternative. In such a way, participants distance themselves from their societies of origin and came closer to the subaltern groups, such as those under the label “refugees”. Informal initiatives participants became, at least figuratively, the new “hybrids” in our society. A group of people figuratively localized between the oppressor forces and the subalterns. Far from essentialist conceptions of hybridity and aware of the critic literature at this respect the concept of hybridity is understood in performative terms. Present study attempts to describe the performance of hybridity by informal initiatives in a context of exercising dialectical power with other social actors, such as authorities as part as the oppressor forces; established civil society which does not seem to really challenge status quo; refugees as a forming subaltern group; and within themselves as part of two worlds full of contradictions and incongruences.

KEY WORDS: performative hybridity, informal initiative, refugee crisis, civil society.

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:
Mario Rodríguez Polo, Palacký University Olomouc, Křížkovského 10, 779 00 Olomouc, CZECH REPUBLIC. E-mail: mario.rodriguez@upol.cz.

REFERENCES:

Acheraiou, A. (2011). Questioning hybridity, postcolonialism and globalization. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Arditti, B. (2012). Insurgencies don’t have a plan – they are the plan: Political performatives and vanishing mediators in 2011. Journalism, Media and Cultural Studies, 1, 1-16.

Augé, M. (1995). Non-places. Introduction to an anthropology of supermodernity. London: Verso.

Badiou, A. (2012). The rebirth of history – Times of riots and uprising. London: Verso.

Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The location of culture. London: Routledge.

della Porta, D., & Diani, M. (2006). Social movements: An introduction. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell. First published 1999.

Falzon, M.-A. (2012). Multi-sited ethnography: Theory, praxis and locality in contemporary research. Farnham: Ashgate.

Hale, Ch. (2008). Engaging contradictions: Theory, politics, and methods of activist scholarship. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Harrell-Bond, B. E. (2002). Can humanitarian work with refugees be humane? Human Rights Quarterly, 24(1), 51-85.

Holmes, S. M., & Castañeda, H. (2016). Representing the ‘European Refugee Crisis’ in Germany and beyond: Deservingness and difference, life and death. American Ethnologist, 43(1), 12-24.

Horst, H. A. (2015). Being in fieldwork: Collaboration, digital media and ethnographic practice. In: R. Sanjek & S. Tratne (Eds.), eFieldnotes: The makings of anthropology in a digital world (153-168). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Kallius, A., Monterescu, D., & Rajaram, P. K. (2016). Immobilizing Mobility: Border ethnography, illiberal democracy, and the politics of the ‘refugee crisis’ in Hungary. American Ethnologist, 43(1), 25-37.

Lánský, O. (2014). Postkolonialismus a dekolonizace: Základní vymezení a inspirace pro sociální vědy. Sociální studia, 11(1), 41-60.

Long, K. (2013). When refugees stopped being migrants: Movement, labour and humanitarian protection. Migration Studies, 1(1), 4-26.

Malkki, L. H. (1995). Refugees and exile: From ‘refugee studies’ to the national order of things. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 495-523.

Marcus, G. E. (1995). Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 95-117.

Speed, Sh. (2006). At the crossroads of human rights and anthropology: Toward a critically engaged activist research. American Anthropologist, 108(1), 66-76.

Wimmer, A., & Glick Schiller, N. (2002). Methodological nationalism and beyond: Nation-state building, migration and the social sciences. Global Networks, 2(4), 301-34.

Yarris, K., & Castañeda, H. (2015). Discourses of displacement and deservingness: Interrogating distinctions between ‘economic’ and ‘forced’ migration. International Migration, 53(3), 64-69.

Young, R. J. C. (2004). Postcolonialism. An historical introduction. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.