COAS
Center for Open Access in Science (COAS)
OPEN JOURNAL FOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (OJIT)

ISSN (Online) 2620-0627 * ojit@centerprode.com

OJIT Home

2024 - Volume 7 - Number 1


Decision Making on Introducing of Blockchain Technology in Croatian Public Administration

Alen Kišić * ORCID: 0000-0002-2196-1092
VERN’ University, Zagreb, CROATIA

Neven Vrček * ORCID: 0000-0002-4037-1522
University of Zagreb, Faculty of Organization and Informatics, Varaždin, CROATIA

Open Journal for Information Technology, 2024, 7(1), 1-10 * https://doi.org/10.32591/coas.ojit.0701.01001k
Received: 20 March 2024 ▪ Revised: 28 April 2024 ▪ Accepted: 10 May 2024

LICENCE: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ARTICLE (Full Text - PDF)


ABSTRACT:
Blockchain technology has many features enabling great potential to transform every aspect of life. In this paper, we consider application of Blockchain in public administration sector. We utilize the Value Measuring Methodology (VMM) for the purpose of the profitability assessment of introducing Blockchain into the public administration. This process is conducted by multi criteria decision making with a group of experts. Results of cost-effectiveness analysis and AHP analysis, which are part of VNM, indicated direct user value as the largest benefit, followed by operational value for the State. Potential risks are identified along with the costs summarizing an analysis.

KEY WORDS: Blockchain technology, public administration, value measuring methodology, effective public administration.

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:
Alen Kišić, VERN’ University, Zagreb, CROATIA.


REFERENCES:

Alketbi, A., Nasir, Q., & Talib, M. A. (2018). Blockchain for government services – Use cases, security benefits and challenges. In 15th Learning and Technology Conference (L&T) (pp. 112-119). IEEE.

Bishr, A. B. (2019). Dubai: A city powered by blockchain. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 12(3-4), 4-8.

Drucker, P. F. (2003). A functioning society. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.

Đurek, V., Kadoić, N., & Oreški, D. (2021). Effective decision making in local government using the hybrid approach based on multi-criteria decision-making methods and machine learning. In 16th International Symposium on Operational Research (SOR 2021) (pp. 565-570).

Glass, R. L. (1999). Evolving a new theory of project success. Communications of the ACM, 42(11), 17-19.

Guegan, D. (2017). Public blockchain versus private blockchain, halshs-01524440.

Hyvärinen, H., Risius, M., & Friis, G. (2017). A blockchain-based approach towards overcoming financial fraud in public sector services. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 59(6), 441-456.

Jalakas, P. (2018). Blockchain from public administration perspective: Case of Estonia. Tallinn.

Jayasinghe, D., Cobourne, S., Markantonakis, K., Akram, R. N., & Mayes, K. (2017). Philanthropy on the Blockchain. In IFIP International Conference on Information Security Theory and Practice (pp. 25-38). Springer, Cham.

Kshetri, N., & Voas, J. (2018). Blockchain-enabled e-voting. IEEE Software, 35(4), 95-99.

Mataracioglu, T. (2015). On the technical description of value measuring methodology. International Journal of Managing Value and Supply Chains (IJMVSC) Vol. 6, No. 2, June 2015.

Ojo, A., & Adebayo, S. (2017). Blockchain as a next generation government information infrastructure: A review of initiatives in D5 Countries. In Government 3.0 – Next Generation Government Technology Infrastructure and Services (pp. 283-298). Springer, Cham.

Oreški, D. (2012). Strategy development by using SWOT-AHP. Tem Journal, 1(4), 283-291.

Pawlak, M., Poniszewska-Marańda, A., & Kryvinska, N. (2018). Towards the intelligent agents for blockchain e-voting system.  Procedia Computer Science, 141, 239-246.

Procaccino, J. D., Verner, J. M., Overmyer, S. P., & Darter, M. E. (2002). Case study: Factors for early prediction of software development success. Information and software technology, 44(1), 53-62.

Sresakoolchai, J., & Kaewunruen, S. (2020). Comparative studies into public private partnership and traditional investment approaches on The High-Speed Rail Project Linking 3 Airports in Thailand. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 5, 100116.

Sullivan, C., & Burger, E. (2017). E-residency and blockchain. Computer Law & Security Review, 33(4), 470-481.

Vacca, A., Di Sorbo, A., Visaggio, C. A., & Canfora, G. (2020). A systematic literature review of blockchain and smart contract development: Techniques, tools, and open challenges. Journal of Systems and Software, 110891.

VNM (2019). An Overview of Value Measuring Methodology (VMM). Available at http://www.cioindex.com/article/articleid/98962/anoverview-of-value-measuring-methodology-vmm, retrieved 12.09.2019.

VNM guide (2019). Value Measuring Methodology Guide. Available at http://www.cioindex.com/article/articleid/791/value-measuringmethodology-guide, retrieved 12.09.2019.

Zahedi, F. (1986). The analytic hierarchy process – A survey of the method and its applications. Interfaces, 16(4), 96-108.

 

© Center for Open Access in Science