![]() |
Center for Open Access in Science (COAS) OPEN JOURNAL FOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (OJIT) ISSN (Online) 2620-0627 * ojit@centerprode.com |
Decision Making on Introducing of Blockchain Technology in Croatian Public Administration Alen Kišić * ORCID: 0000-0002-2196-1092 Neven Vrček * ORCID: 0000-0002-4037-1522 Open Journal for Information Technology, 2024, 7(1), 1-10 * https://doi.org/10.32591/coas.ojit.0701.01001k LICENCE: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. ARTICLE (Full Text - PDF) |
ABSTRACT: KEY WORDS: Blockchain technology, public administration, value measuring methodology, effective public administration. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: |
REFERENCES: Alketbi, A., Nasir, Q., & Talib, M. A. (2018). Blockchain for government services – Use cases, security benefits and challenges. In 15th Learning and Technology Conference (L&T) (pp. 112-119). IEEE. Bishr, A. B. (2019). Dubai: A city powered by blockchain. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 12(3-4), 4-8. Drucker, P. F. (2003). A functioning society. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction. Đurek, V., Kadoić, N., & Oreški, D. (2021). Effective decision making in local government using the hybrid approach based on multi-criteria decision-making methods and machine learning. In 16th International Symposium on Operational Research (SOR 2021) (pp. 565-570). Glass, R. L. (1999). Evolving a new theory of project success. Communications of the ACM, 42(11), 17-19. Guegan, D. (2017). Public blockchain versus private blockchain, halshs-01524440. Hyvärinen, H., Risius, M., & Friis, G. (2017). A blockchain-based approach towards overcoming financial fraud in public sector services. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 59(6), 441-456. Jalakas, P. (2018). Blockchain from public administration perspective: Case of Estonia. Tallinn. Jayasinghe, D., Cobourne, S., Markantonakis, K., Akram, R. N., & Mayes, K. (2017). Philanthropy on the Blockchain. In IFIP International Conference on Information Security Theory and Practice (pp. 25-38). Springer, Cham. Kshetri, N., & Voas, J. (2018). Blockchain-enabled e-voting. IEEE Software, 35(4), 95-99. Mataracioglu, T. (2015). On the technical description of value measuring methodology. International Journal of Managing Value and Supply Chains (IJMVSC) Vol. 6, No. 2, June 2015. Ojo, A., & Adebayo, S. (2017). Blockchain as a next generation government information infrastructure: A review of initiatives in D5 Countries. In Government 3.0 – Next Generation Government Technology Infrastructure and Services (pp. 283-298). Springer, Cham. Oreški, D. (2012). Strategy development by using SWOT-AHP. Tem Journal, 1(4), 283-291. Pawlak, M., Poniszewska-Marańda, A., & Kryvinska, N. (2018). Towards the intelligent agents for blockchain e-voting system. Procedia Computer Science, 141, 239-246. Procaccino, J. D., Verner, J. M., Overmyer, S. P., & Darter, M. E. (2002). Case study: Factors for early prediction of software development success. Information and software technology, 44(1), 53-62. Sresakoolchai, J., & Kaewunruen, S. (2020). Comparative studies into public private partnership and traditional investment approaches on The High-Speed Rail Project Linking 3 Airports in Thailand. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 5, 100116. Sullivan, C., & Burger, E. (2017). E-residency and blockchain. Computer Law & Security Review, 33(4), 470-481. Vacca, A., Di Sorbo, A., Visaggio, C. A., & Canfora, G. (2020). A systematic literature review of blockchain and smart contract development: Techniques, tools, and open challenges. Journal of Systems and Software, 110891. VNM (2019). An Overview of Value Measuring Methodology (VMM). Available at http://www.cioindex.com/article/articleid/98962/anoverview-of-value-measuring-methodology-vmm, retrieved 12.09.2019. VNM guide (2019). Value Measuring Methodology Guide. Available at http://www.cioindex.com/article/articleid/791/value-measuringmethodology-guide, retrieved 12.09.2019. Zahedi, F. (1986). The analytic hierarchy process – A survey of the method and its applications. Interfaces, 16(4), 96-108.
|
© Center for Open Access in Science