COAS
Center for Open Access in Science (COAS)
OPEN JOURNAL FOR STUDIES IN LINGUISTICS (OJSL)

ISSN (Online) 2620-0678 * ojsl@centerprode.com

OJSL Home

2022 - Volume 5 - Number 1


“Our Message Can Be Summarized with These Words: Britain First”: A Multimodal Critical Discourse Analysis of the Speech of Oswald Mosley’s character from the Peaky Blinders Series

Christian Ariel Aguilera Sustaita * chris.aguil.93@gmail.com * ORCID: 0000-0001-9210-1770
University of Guanajuato, Division of Social Sciences and Humanities, Guanajuato, MEXICO

Open Journal for Studies in Linguistics, 2022, 5(1), 11-22 * https://doi.org/10.32591/coas.ojsl.0501.02011a
Received: 11 June 2022 ▪ Revised: 26 July 2022 ▪ Accepted: 31 July 2022

LICENCE: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ARTICLE (Full Text - PDF)


ABSTRACT:
Fascism is a radical and polemic political movement that had its origin in Italy after World War I. Thereupon, different versions of this ideology emerged in several European countries such as England, where Oswald Mosley was its precursor and the founder of the British Union of Fascists. Through his powerful speeches, he achieved to persuade the English elite to help him position himself as a leader and establish fascism in Britain. This article addresses a fictitious interpretation of Oswald Mosley giving a political speech in the middle of a sophisticated party. The main intention of this work is to explore the mechanisms of persuasion employed by the fictitious version of Mosley to address his audiences and convince them to accept his message. Some findings reveal that the use of polite expressions as well as remarkable confidence in his speech, helped Mosley gain the sympathy of his listeners.

KEY WORDS: multimodal critical discourse analysis, Oswald Mosley, fascism, mechanisms of persuasion, British Union of Fascists.

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:
Christian Ariel Aguilera Sustaita, University of Guanajuato, Division of Social Sciences and Humanities, Guanajuato, MEXICO. E-mail: chris.aguil.93@gmail.com.


REFERENCES:

Almurashi, W. A. (2016). An introduction to Halliday’s systemic functional linguistics. Journal for the study of English Linguistics4(1), 70-80. https://doi.org/10.5296/jsel.v4i1.9423

Amoussou, F., & Allagbe, A. A. (2018). Principles, theories and approaches to critical discourse analysis. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature6(1), 11-18. https://doi.org/10.20431/2347-3134.0601002

Fairclough, N. (1994). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman.

Griffin, R. (1993). A new ideal type of generic fascism. The Nature of fascism (pp. 26-56). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315003627

Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. Edward Arnold. https://doi.org/10.1017/s004740450000782x

Halliday, M. A. K., & Webster, J. J. (2003). On language and linguistics. Continuum.

Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (1996) Reading images: The grammar of visual design. Routledge.

Love, G. (2007). What’s the big idea? Oswald Mosley, the British Union of Fascists and generic fascism. Journal of Contemporary History42(3), 447-468. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022009407078334

Machin, D. (2013) What is multimodal critical discourse studies? Critical Discourse Studies, 10(4), 347-355. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2013.813770

Machin, D., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2007). Language and image. Global media discourse: A critical introduction (pp. 105-169). Routledge.

Macpherson, W. (2018). The process and elements of persuasion. The psychology of persuasion (pp. 11-35). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203705063-1

McCloud, N. (2006). Oswald Mosley and the British Union of Fascists: A brief historiographical inquiry. History Compass4(4), 687-697. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-0542.2006.00334.x

O’Halloran, K. L. (2011). Multimodal discourse analysis. In K. Hyland & B. Paltridge (Eds.), Companion to Discourse. Continuum.

Prihandari, I., & Yohannes, S. B. (2021) Persuasive strategies in diary Kike Wadatsumi no Koe (Critical discourse analysis study). International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 6(7), 588-592.

Renton, D. (2000). UK: Was fascism an ideology? British fascism reconsidered. Race & Class41(3), 72-84. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351158367-18

Richardson, J. E., & Flowerdew, J. (2017). Fascist discourse. In J. E. Richardson (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies (pp. 447-461). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315739342-31

Voicu, C. G. (2013). Communication as political discourse: Persuasive mechanisms and strategies. International Journal of Communication Research3(3), 210-216.

© Center for Open Access in Science