COAS
Center for Open Access in Science (COAS)
OPEN JOURNAL FOR STUDIES IN LINGUISTICS (OJSL)

ISSN (Online) 2620-0678 * ojsl@centerprode.com

OJSL Home

2024 - Volume 7 - Number 1


Metathesis in Language Acquisition of Greek

Anastasios Poulidakis * ORCID: 0000-0002-7992-2192
University of Crete, School of Philosophy, Rethymno, GREECE

Open Journal for Studies in Linguistics, 2024, 7(1), 1-16 * https://doi.org/10.32591/coas.ojsl.0701.01001p
Received: 21 March 2024 ▪ Revised: 18 April 2024 ▪ Accepted: 24 April 2024

LICENCE: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ARTICLE (Full Text - PDF)


ABSTRACT:
This study investigates metathesis in children so that to see if it facilitates their language development and in which way. For this reason, thirteen Greek-speaking children are examined varying in age from 2;6.9 to 6;1.26. The data come from picture naming and spontaneous speech. Their examination reveals that its emergence lies to segmental, prosodic and phonotactic reasons. More specifically, metathesis helps children avoid specific sequences of consonants by switching them positions. It also assists them to avoid clusters located in unstressed syllables or illicit structures in the ambient language, as complex codas in loanwords. All metathesized segments are located in positions that can occupy according to the rules of Greek. For the data analysis, Optimality Theory is used (Prince & Smolensky, 1993), while we adopt the Multiple Parallel Grammars model (Revithiadou & Tzakosta, 2004) for the two different patterns attested in their speech.

KEY WORDS: language acquisition, metathesis in Greek, phonology, Optimality Theory.

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:
Anastasios Poulidakis, University of Crete, School of Philosophy, Rethymno, GREECE.


REFERENCES:

Alqahtani, S. M. (2018). Phonological derivations of synchronic metathesis in Modern Persian. Advances in Language and Literary Studies 9(4), 92-97. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.9n.4p.92

Beckman, N. J. (1998). Positional faithfulness. (Doctoral dissertation). Amherst: University of Massachusetts. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations/AAI9823717.

Beckman, N. J. (2004). On the status of CODACOND in phonology. International Journal of English Studies 4(2), 105-134. https://revistas.um.es/ijes/article/view/48001.

Bernhardt, H. B., & Stemberger, P. J. (1998). Handbook of phonological development: From the perspective of constraint-based nonlinear phonology. San Diego:Academic Press.

Demuth, K. (1995). Markedness and the development of prosodic structure. In J. N. Beckman (Ed.), Proceedings of NELS 25(2) (pp. 13-25). Amherst, MA: GLSA, University of Massachusetts. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/nels/vol25/iss2/3.

Edwards, L. M. (1996). Word position effects in the production of fricatives. In B. Bernhardt, J. Gilbert & D. Ingram (Eds.), Proceedings of the UBC International Conference on Phonological Acquisition (pp. 149-158). Boston, MA: Cascadilla Press.

Fukazawa, H., & Miglio, V. (2008). What metathesis reveals about L1 and L2 acquisition. In R. Slabakova, J. Rothman, P. Kempchinsky & E. Gavruseva (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2007) (pp. 30-36). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.

Gatsou, M. (2022). The acquisition of marked syllable structures CVC and CCV in Greek L1: Children with specific language impairment. (Master’s thesis). Rethymno: University of Crete.

Gerlach, R. S. (2010). The acquisition of consonant feature sequences: Harmony, metathesis and deletion patterns in phonological development (Doctoral dissertation). TheUniversity of Minnesota.

Gnanadesikan, E. A. (2004). Markedness and faithfulness constraints in child phonology. In R. Kager, J. Pater & W. Zonneveld (Eds.), Constraints in Phonological Acquisition (pp. 73-108). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486418.004

Gutiérrez, A. (2010). Metathesis in Nivaclé. In B. Rogers & A. Szakay (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th Workshop on Structure and Constituency in Languages of the Americas (WSCLA), UBC Working Papers in Linguistics 29 (pp. 115-125). Ottawa: University of British Columbia.

Hock, H. H. (1985). Regular metathesis. Linguistics 23(4), 529-546. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1985.23.4.529

Hume, V. E. (2004). The indeterminacy/attestation model of metathesis. Language 80(2), 203-237. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2004.0083

Kappa, I. (1995). Syllable phonology in German and Modern Greek (in German, unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Salzburg.

Kappa, I. (2009). On the acquisition of liquids in Modern Greek: A developmental account. In M. Stavrou-Sifaki, D. Papadopoulou & M. Theodoropoulou (Eds.), Studies in Greek Linguistics, Proceedings of the 29th Annual Meeting of the Department of Linguistics (pp. 478-485). Thessaloniki: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.

Kiparsky, P. (1979). Metrical structure assignment is cyclic. Linguistic Inquiry 10(3), 421-441. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4178120.

Leonard, B. L., & Mcgregor, K. K. (1991). Unusual phonological patterns and their underlying representations: A case study. Journal of Child Language 18(2), 261-271. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900011053

Łukaszewicz, B. (2007). Reduction in syllable onsets in the acquisition of Polish: Deletion, coalescence, metathesis and gemination. Journal of Child Language, 34(1), 53-82. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000906007707

Malikouti-Drachman, A. (2001). Greek phonology: A contemporary perspective. Journal of Greek Linguistics 2(1), 187-243. https://doi.org/10.1075/jgl.2.08mal

McCarthy, J. J. (2008). The gradual path to cluster simplification. Phonology 25(2), 271-319. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675708001486

McCarthy, J. J., & Prince, A. (1995). Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. In J. N. Beckman, S. Urbanczyk & L. W. Dickey (Eds.), Papers in Optimality Theory, University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers 18 (pp. 249-384). Amherst, MA: GLSA.

Murray, W. R., & Vennemann, T. (1983). Sound change and syllable structure in Germanic phonology. Language, 59(3), 514-528. https://doi.org/10.2307/413901

Papadopoulou, K. (2000). Phonological acquisition of Modern Greek (Unpublished Bachelor’s Honours thesis). University of Newcastle.

Prince, A., & Smolensky, P. (1993). Optimality Theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. (Master’s thesis). Rutgers University, New Brunswick and University of Colorado Boulder.

Qasem, F. (2023). Phonological metathesis phenomenon in the early speech of Arabic-speaking children. Saudi Journal of Language Studies, 3(4), 220-231. https://doi.org/10.1108/SJLS-07-2023-0030

Revithiadou, A., & Tzakosta, M. (2004). Markedness hierarchies vs. positional faithfulness and the role of multiple grammars in the acquisition of Greek. In J. van Kampen & S. Baauw (Eds.), Proceedings of GALA 2003: Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition 2 (pp. 377-388). Utrecht: LOT.

Selkirk, O. E. (1984). Phonology and syntax: The relation between sound and structure. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Setatos, M. (1974). Phonology of Modern Greek Koine (in Greek). Athens: Papazisis.

Smith, L. J. (2002). Phonological augmentation in prominent positions. (Doctoral dissertation). Amherst: University of Massachusetts. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations/AAI3056278.

Tzakosta, M., & Kappa, I. (2008). Syllable types in child Greek: A developmental account. In A. Gavarró & M. J. Freitas (Eds.), Language Acquisition and Development: Proceedings of Gala 2007 (pp. 467-471). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.


© Center for Open Access in Science