OPEN JOURNAL FOR STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY (OJSP)
ISSN (Online) 2560-5380 * ojsp@centerprode.com
|
Center for Open Access in Science (COAS) OPEN JOURNAL FOR STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY (OJSP) ISSN (Online) 2560-5380 * ojsp@centerprode.com |
To Think About Deliberative Democracy
Tatyana Vasileva Petkova * tatianavas@abv.bg * ORCID: 0000-0003-4567-8635 * ResearcherID: I-2809-2015
South-West University “Neofit Rilski”, Faculty of Philosophy, Blagoevgrad
Open Journal for Studies in Philosophy, 2017, 1(1), 15-26 * https://doi.org/10.32591/coas.ojsp.0101.02015p
Online Published Date: 15 December 2017
LICENCE: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
ARTICLE (Full Text - PDF)
KEY WORDS: deliberative democracy, digital-virtual public space, digital democracy, form of the direct democracy.
ABSTRACT:
The conflict between digital and real democracy – for thirty years now the digital-virtual public space is the undeniable and the influential factor which influences the human behavior and thinking. The digital democracy is part of this digital-virtual space. This form of direct democracy has got itself the different dimensions: on the one hand, the representatives of a direct and a representative democracy are seek to influence through the electronic media and the digital channels of the representative and the direct democracy, which are a different, as well as the actual policy instruments to try to implement specific applications of the digital media in a politics and for the government activities; on the other hand, the digital democracy has got twenty years of experience in the implementation of a digital democracy in the provision of information, of the online discussions and of making decisions; furthermore, the digital-electronic democracy participates in the real politics. The digital democracy is being considered by the governments and the way to their orientation to the modern and the digital active of the civil society. The digital democracy is a kind of the regulator form of the real social democracy – e.g. the issue of media freedom.
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:
Tatyana Vasileva Petkova, South-West University “Neofit Rilski”, Faculty of Philosophy, 66 Ivan Michailov st., 2700 Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria. E-mail: tatianavas@abv.bg.
REFERENCES:
Ackerman, F., & Ackerman, B. (2010). Why the Lib Dems do well out of TV debates, http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/series/general-election-2010-cif-at-the-polls . Accessed 22 November 2017.
Antonov, T. (2014). The development of ICT and new horizons for the deliberative democracy. In: Digital culture and society. “Neofit Rilski” Blagoevgrad Academic Press.
Arterton, Ch. F. (1987). Teledemocracy: Can technology protect democracy? Newbury Park, CA: Press.
Becker, T. L. (1981). Teledemocracy: bringing power back to the people. Futurist, 15(6), 6-9.
Barber, B.J. (1984). Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a New Age. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Berners-Lee, T. (2000). Weaving the web: The original design and ultimate destiny of the World Wide Web, Press. http://www.amazon.com/Weaving-Web-Original-Ultimate-Destiny/dp/006251587X. Accessed 22 November 2017.
Bimber, B. (2003). Information and American democracy: Technology in the evolution of political power. Cambridge University Press.
Castells, M. (2004). The rise of the network society. Sofia: “LIK” Press.
Dewey, J. (1994). Democracy and education. Courier Dover Publications, NY, http://www.google.bg/books?hl=bg&lr=&id=19ajcXf4MCYC&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=john+dewey,+democracy&ots=lHtw4rRjEb&sig=bBgVn9LyNR1DviNQBeU6B1iWkwA&redir_esc=y# v=onepage&q=j ohn%20dewey%2C%20democracy&f=false. Accessed 22 November 2017.
Dijk, V, J. (2005). The deepening divide: Inequality in the information society. SAGE Publications Press.
Dijk, V, J. (2006). The Network Society. University of Twente, Netherlands; SAGE Publications Press.
Dijk, V. J., & Jan, A.G.M (2013). Digital democracy: Vision and reality of public administration in the information age: Revisited. IOS- Press. http://www.utwente.nl/gw/vandijk/research/itv/itv_plaatje/Digital%20Democracy%20Vision%20and%20Reality.pdf. Accessed 22 November 2017.
Frissen, V. A. J. (2008). The E-mancipation of the citizen and the future of e-government: Reflections on ICT and citizens “participation”. A. Anttiroiko Press.
Habermas, J. (2008). Between facts and norms. The MIT Press, Cambrige.
Leadbeater, Ch., & Cottam, H. (2008). The user-generated state and public services 2.0. http://www.charlesleadbeater.net/archive/public-services-20.aspx. Accessed 22 November 2017.
Metcalfe, B. (2000). Internet collapses and other InfoWorld punditry. IDG Books Press.
Paparachissi, Z. (2009). The virtual Sphere 2.0: The Internet, the public sphere and beyond. In: A. Chadwick & Ph. Howard Press. http://en.rsf.org/press-freedom-index-2013,1054.html. Accessed 22 November 2017.
Reilly, T. (2005). What Is Web 2. http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/whatis-web-20.html. Retrieved September 17 2010. Accessed 22 November 2017. Rols, J. (1998). A theory of justice. Sofia: C. A. Press.
© Center for Open Access in Science