COAS
Center for Open Access in Science (COAS)
OPEN JOURNAL FOR STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY (OJSP)

ISSN (Online) 2560-5380 * ojsp@centerprode.com

OJSP Home

2022 - Volume 6 - Number 1


Indigenous Philosophy and Multiple Modernities

Fasil Merawi * fasil.merawi@aau.edu.et * ORCID: 0000-0002-9661-4503
Addis Ababa University, College of Social Sciences, Addis Ababa, ETHIOPIA

Open Journal for Studies in Philosophy, 2022, 6(1), 13-20 * https://doi.org/10.32591/coas.ojsp.0601.02013m
Received: 30 June 2022 ▪ Revised: 23 July 2022 ▪ Accepted: 30 July 2022

LICENCE: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ARTICLE (Full Text - PDF)


ABSTRACT:
The inception of the project of modernity resides in the projection of a self-fulfilling subjective rationality that leads both to better self-understanding as well as a control of the environment. Still, failing to serve a truly universal human agenda, modernity narrowly propagated the values of Western culture. Part of justifying such an ideological status quo is made possible by the colonial sciences that ascribed reason, logic and objectivity to Westerners and emotion, affection and oneness to the “other”. Operating within a binary framework of tradition and modernity and emotion and rationality, the colonial sciences like anthropology and ethnology created the notion of an indigenous culture and knowledge that is strictly traditional, static, oral and non-progressive. As such, rather than studying others in their entire milieu, the colonial sciences propounded an antithesis between traditional indigenous culture which is a seat of mythology, and scientific modernity that is empirical and technical. Such a quest systematically degrades indigenous knowledge, culture and philosophy for the paradigm of scientific and technological rationality. This paper argues that the solution to such Westernization of all human knowledge resides in the concept of multiple modernities which situates alternative movements in the world of globalization as attempts to contextualize modernity in different sites of knowledge and also allows for different cognitive dimensions that are mutually incommensurable. This allows for the contestation of indigenous, scientific, secular and other modes of knowledge.

KEY WORDS: colonial sciences, myth of indigenous knowledge, multiple modernities.

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:
Fasil Merawi, Addis Ababa University, College of Social Sciences, Department of Philosophy, Addis Ababa, ETHIOPIA. E-mail: fasil.merawi@aau.edu.et.


 

REFERENCES:

Brouwer, J. (1998). On indigenous knowledge and development. Current Anthropology, 39(3), 351.

Derman, B. (2003). Cultures of development and indigenous knowledge: The erosion of traditional boundaries. Africa Today, 50(2), 67-85.

Doxtater, M. G. (2004), Indigenous knowledge in the decolonial era. American Indian Quarterly, 28(3/4), Special Issue: The Recovery of Indigenous Knowledge, pp. 618-633.

Eisenstadt, S. N., Sachsenmaier, D., & Riedel, J. (2002). Reflections on multiple modernities, European, Chinese and other interpretations. London: Brill.

Eisenstadt, S. N. (2003). Comparative civilizations and multiple modernities. London: Brill.

Eze, E. C. (1997). Postcolonial African philosophy: A critical reader. U.S.A.: Blackwell Publishers.

Eze, E. C. 2008. On reason, rationality in a world of cultural conflict and racism. U.S.A.: Duke University press.

Ichijo, A. (2013). Nationalism and multiple modernities: Europe and beyond. Kingston University, UK, Palgrave Macmillan.

Lewis, D. (1973). Anthropology and colonialism. Current Anthropology, 14, 581-602.

Masolo, D. A. (2003). Philosophy and indigenous knowledge: An African perspective. Africa Today, 50(2), 21-38.

Mcgovern, S. M. (2000). Reclaiming education: Knowledge practices and indigenous communities. Comparative Education Review, 44(4), 523-529.

Medina, V. (1992). The possibility of an indigenous philosophy: A Latin American perspective. American Philosophical Quarterly, 29(4), 373-380.

Morgan, D. L. (2003). Appropriation, appreciation, accommodation: Indigenous wisdoms and knowledges in higher education. International Review of Education, 49(1/2), 35-49.

Morris, B. (2010). Indigenous knowledge. The Society of Malawi Journal, 63(1), 1-9.

Mudimde, V. Y. (1988). The invention of Africa: Gnosis, philosophy and the order of knowledge. U.S.A.: Indiana university press.

Pels, P. (1997). The anthropology of colonialism, culture, history and the emergence of Western governmentality. Annual Review of Anthropology, 26, 163-183.

Ramose, M. B. (2007). African philosophy through Ubuntu. Mondbola publishing.

Schiebenger, L. (2005). The European colonial science complex. Vol. 96, pp. 52-55. University of Chicago Press.

Sheperd, N. (2002). The politics of archaeology in Africa. Annual review of Anthropology, 31, 189-209.

Whitt, L. (2009). Science, colonialism and indigenous peoples, the cultural politics of law and knowledge. Cambridge university press, U.K.

 

© Center for Open Access in Science