COAS
Center for Open Access in Science (COAS)
OPEN JOURNAL FOR STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY (OJSP)

ISSN (Online) 2560-5380 * ojsp@centerprode.com

OJSP Home

2022 - Volume 6 - Number 2


Entwined Dangers: Pandemic and Modern Technology

Bowen Zha * zhb.bowen.030@s.kyushu-u.ac.jp
Kyushu University, Faculty of Humanities, Fukuoka, JAPAN

Open Journal for Studies in Philosophy, 2022, 6(2), 39-48 * https://doi.org/10.32591/coas.ojsp.0602.01039z
Received: 2 February 2022 ▪ Revised: 10 July 2022 ▪ Accepted: 26 September 2022

LICENCE: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ARTICLE (Full Text - PDF)


ABSTRACT:
The COVID-19 pandemic constitutes a crisis situation in which the dangers posed by modern technology have never been more pronounced. As the devastation of the coronavirus epidemic continues, epidemic control around the world is focused on the introduction of new legal and regulatory measures against the virus. In this paper, I analyze Heidegger’s and Foucault’s critical theory of modern technology to show that the threat is not only biological, but also ontological: the threat of modern technology to our existential state of being, which cannot be ignored. The existential dangers posed by modern technology to the social control of human rights are far more subtle and have as long-reaching effects as the biological dangers of COVID-19.

KEY WORDS: coronavirus, modern technology, biopower, Heidegger, Foucault.

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:
Bowen Zha, Kyushu University, Faculty of Humanities, Fukuoka, JAPAN. E-mail: zhb.bowen.030@s.kyushu-u.ac.jp.


 

REFERENCES:

Camporesi, S. (2020). It didn’t have to be this way: Reflections on the ethical justification of the running ban in northern italy in response to the 2020 COVID-19 outbreak. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry.

Dreyfus, H. (2006). Heidegger on the connection between nihilism, art, technology, and politics. In C. B. Guignon, The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger. Cambridge University Press.

Foucault, M. (1990). Politics, philosophy, culture: Interviews and other writings, 1977-1984. Routledge.

Foucault, M. (1997). Ethics: Subjectivity and truth. The New Press New York.

Foucault, M. (2003). Society must be defended: Lectures at the College de France, 1975-76. Picador.

Heidegger, M. (1966). Discourse on thinking. New York, NY: Harper & Row.

Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology and other essays. Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc.

Heidegger, M. (2003). The end of philosophy. The University of Chicago Press.

Heidegger, M. (2012). Bremen and Freiburg lectures: Insight into that which is and basic principles. Indiana University Press.

Keiling, T. (2016). Let things be for themselves: Gelassenheit as enabling thinking. In C. M. Edited by Aaron James Wendland, Heidegger on Technology (pp. 96-114).

Rayner, T. (May 2001). Biopower and technology: Foucault and Heidegger’s way of thinking. Contretemps, 142-156.

Rhiannon Frowde, E. S. (2020). Fail to prepare and you prepare to fail: The human rights consequences of the UK Government’s inaction during the COVID-19 pandemic. Asian Bioethics Review.

Zizek, S. (2013). Zizek’s jokes. The MIT Press.

© Center for Open Access in Science