OJSP Home

2022 - Volume 6 - Number 2

Towards the Multistage Ecosocial Theory of Glottogenesis: Modern Evolutionary Concepts, Principles, and Extension of the Nomological Approach

Nikolai S. Rozov * nrozov@gmail.com * ORCID: 0000-0003-2362-541X
Novosibirsk State Technical University, Department of International Relations and Regional Studies, Novosibirsk, RUSSIA

Open Journal for Studies in Philosophy, 2022, 6(2), 49-66 * https://doi.org/10.32591/coas.ojsp.0602.02049r
Received: 17 October 2022 ▪ Revised: 21 December 2022 ▪ Accepted: 30 December 2022

LICENCE: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ARTICLE (Full Text - PDF)

ABSTRACT:
In recent decades, studies of the origin of language have seen shifts toward multistage concepts, explanations based on social and ecological patterns, and the integration of different levels of analysis (from behavioral practices to gene structures). The article develops these ideas. It aims to streamline and integrate evolutionary concepts and principles, suggest a special explanatory methodology. The models of gene-culture coevolution (Wilson et al.) and cultural drive (Laland et al.) are connected with the functionalist model of homeostatic dynamics and development (A. Stinchcombe). The conceptual core of the theory consists of the “zone of nearest evolutionary development,” “concern (need),” “providing structure,” “magic wand.” The formulated fundamental principles — a kind of "universal laws" of glottogenesis — draw on a rich intellectual tradition in biology and macrosociology. A priori rules fix the conditions of each new complexity stage of glottogenesis emergence. The main difficulty lies in justifying and explaining these stages. Moreover, the data obtained in archaeology, paleoanthropology, paleoclimatology, and paleogenetics are indirect. The extended variant of nomological explanation (C. Hempel) allows “on the industrial basis” to construct theoretical hypotheses and check them with the help of modern observations, comparisons, and experiments. Justified by this way, regularities connected logically with various indirect paleoscientific data can explain the main stages of early language evolution.

KEY WORDS: language origin, glottogenesis, gene-cultural coevolution, cultural drive, functional approach evolutionary principles, language complexity, nomological approach.

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:
Nikolai S. Rozov, Novosibirsk State Technical University, Department of International Relations and Regional Studies, Novosibirsk, RUSSIA. E-mail: nrozov@gmail.com.

REFERENCES:

Alexander, R. D. (1987). The biology of moral systems. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

Bickerton, D. (2009). Adam’s tongue: How humans made language, how language made humans. New York: Hill and Wang.

Boehm, Chr. (2015). The evolution of social control. In J. H. Turner, R. Machalek & A. Maryanski (Eds.), Handbook on evolution and society. Toward an evolutionary social science (pp. 424-440). Boulder, London: Paradigm Publishers.

Burling, R. (2005). The talking ape. How language evolved. Oxford University Press.

Bybee, J. (2002). Sequentiallity as the basis of constituent structure. In T. Givón & B. F. Malle (Eds.). The evolution of language out of pre‑language (pp. 109-134). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Collins, R. (2004). Interaction ritual chains. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Coupé, C., & Hombert, J.-M. (2005). Polygenesis of linguistic strategies: A scenario for the emergence of languages. In J. W. Minett & W.S.-Y. Wang (Eds.), Language acquisition, change and emergence: Essays in evolutionary linguistics (pp. 1-49). Hong Kong.

Dessalles, J.-L. (2007). Why we talk. The evolutionary origins of language. Oxford University Press.

Donald, M. (1998). Hominid enculturation and cognitive evolution. In C. Scarre (Ed.), Cognition and material culture: The archaeology of symbolic storage (pp. 7-17). Cambridge: McDonald Institute.

Dor, D., Knight, Chr., & Lewis, J. (Eds.) (2014). The social origins of language. Oxford University Press.

Gabora L., & Smith C. M. (2018). Two cognitive transitions underlying the capacity for cultural evolution. Journal of Anthropological Sciences, 96, 1-26.

Gintis, H. (2004). The genetic side of gene-culture coevolution: Internalization of norms and prosocial emotions. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,53, 57-67.

Givón, T. (2009). The genesis of syntactic complexity: Diachrony, ontogeny, neuro‑cognition, evolution. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publ. Company.

Hempel, C. (1942). The function of general laws in history. The Journal of Philosophy, 39, 35-48.

Hockett, Ch. (1963). The problem of universals in language. In J. H. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of Language. The MIT Press, pp. 1-22.

Hurford, J. R. (2012). Language in the light of evolution: Vol. II, The origins of grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jackendoff, R. (2002). Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford University Press.

Kirby, S. (2017). Culture and biology in the origins of linguistic structure. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 24: 118-137.

Koonin, E. V. (2011). The logic of chance. On the nature and origin of biological evolution. FT Press.

Laland, K. N. (2017). Darwin’s unfinished symphony. How culture made the human mind. Princeton & Oxford: Princeton University Press.

Markov, A. V., & Markov M. A. (2020). Runaway brain-culture coevolution as a reason for larger brains: Exploring the “cultural drive” hypothesis by computer modeling. Ecology and Evolution, 10(12), 1-19.

Morgan, T. J. H., Uomini, N. T., Rendell, L. E., Chouinard-Thuly, L., Street, S. E., Lewis, H. M., Cross, C. P., Evans, C., Kearney, R., de la Torre, I., Whiten, A., & Laland K. N. (2015). Experimental evidence for the coevolution of hominin tool-making, teaching and language. Nature Communications 6(6029), 1-8.

Nolfi, S., & Mirolli, M. (Eds.)  (2010). Evolution of communication and language in embodied agents. Springer.

Odling-Smee, F. J., Laland K. N., & Feldman, M. W. (2003). Niche construction: The neglected process in evolution. Princeton University Press.

Oppenheimer, S. (2012). Out of Eden: The peopling of the world. Robinson.

Popov, I. (2018). Orthogenesis versus Darwinism. Springer Nature.

Richards, R. J. (1987). Darwin and the emergence of evolutionary theories of mind and behavior. University of Chicago Press.

Richerson, P. J., & Boyd, R. (1992). Cultural inheritance and evolutionary ecology. In E. A. Smith & B. Winterhalder (Eds.), Evolutionary ecology and human behavior (pp. 61-92). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

Rumbaugh, M. D. (2013). With apes in mind: Emergents, communication & competence. CreateSpace.

Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms: An experimental analysis. Appleton-Century.

Spencer, H. [1901] (2021). Essays: Scientific, political, and speculative. London: Routledge.

Sterelny, K. (2016). Cumulative cultural evolution and the origins of language. Biological Theory, 11(3), 173-186.

Stinchcombe, A. (1987). Constructing social theories. University of Chicago Press.

Tamariz, M., & Kirby, S. (2016). The cultural evolution of language. Current Opinion in Psychology, 8, 37-43.

Tomasello, M. (2008). The origins of human communication. Massachusetts, MA: MIT Press.

Toynbee, A. [1961] (2013). Studies of history. Oxford University Press.

Turner, J. H., & Maryanski, A. (2008). On the origin of societies by natural selection. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.

Vygotsky, L. S. [1930] (1997). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky, vol. The history of the development of higher mental functions (R. W. Rieber, Ed.). Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.

Wildgen, W. (2012). Language evolution as a cascade of behavioral bifurcations. Estudios de. Linguistica Universidad de Alicante, 26, 359-382.

Wilson, E., & Lumsden, Ch. J. (1983). Promethean fire. Reflections on the origin of the mind. Harvard University Press.