COAS
Center for Open Access in Science (COAS)
OPEN JOURNAL FOR STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY (OJSP)

ISSN (Online) 2560-5380 * ojsp@centerprode.com

OJSP Home

2023 - Volume 7 - Number 1


Plato in East Asia?

Hyun Jin Kim * ORCID: 0009-0009-5261-8746
University of Melbourne, Faculty or Arts, School of Historical and Philosophical Studies, Melbourne, AUSTRALIA

Niv Horesh * ORCID: 0000-0002-2204-0017
Hebrew University, The Louis Frieberg Center for Asian Studies, Jerusalem, ISRAEL

Open Journal for Studies in Philosophy, 2023, 7(1), 9-18 * https://doi.org/10.32591/coas.ojsp.0701.02009k
Received: 27 June 2023 ▪ Revised: 7 August 2023 ▪ Accepted: 9 August 2023

LICENCE: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ARTICLE (Full Text - PDF)


ABSTRACT:
Shadi Bartsch in her recent publication Plato goes to China (2023) has argued that Plato and the Greek classics have had an out-sized impact on Chinese politics and intelligentsia. This article, while sympathetic to her approach, argues that there is little evidence that Plato and the Greek Classics have exerted any direct influence on Chinese politics. Rather it argues that what influence Plato has had on China is actually indirect via a pre-war national socialist Japanese filter. In pre-World War II Japan Plato was fetishized as the ancient source of western socialist and communist thinking. Radical extremists such as Kita Ikki and Kanokogi Kazunobu created a new ideology that mingled aspects of Platonism with socialism and Japanese nationalism. They hoped thereby to create a modern-day Platonic utopia for the East Asian races (and for the Japanese in particular). This article examines how this modern-day “version” of Platonism with “Asian” characteristics impacted on pre-war Japan and modern East Asia as a whole.

KEY WORDS: Shadi Bartsch, Plato, Chinese intellectual history, Japanese intellectual history, Liang Qichao, Kita Ikki, Kanokogi Kazunobu.

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:
Hyun Jin Kim, University of Melbourne, Faculty or Arts, School of Historical and Philosophical Studies, Melbourne, AUSTRALIA.


 

REFERENCES:

Cheek, T. (2015). The intellectual in modern Chinese history. Cambridge University Press.

Fan, X. (2021). World history and national identity in China. Cambridge University Press.

Fogel, J. A. (2004). The role of Japan in Liang Qichao’s introduction of modern Western Civilization to China. University of California Press.

Fung, S. K. E. (2010).  The intellectual foundations of Chinese modernity: Cultural and political thought in the Republican Era. Cambridge University Press.

Hiroshi, N. (2019). An adoring gaze: The idea of Greece in modern Japan. In Almut-Barbara Renger & Xin Fan (Eds.), Receptions of Greek and Roman antiquity in East Asia. Brill, 175-201.

Horesh, N. (2021). “’One country, two histories’: How PRC and Western narratives of China’s pre-imperial and imperial past diverge. Asian Affairs, 52(1), 110-129.

Ichiro, T. (2019). History and reception of Greek and Latin studies in Japan. In Almut-Barbara Renger & Xin Fan (Eds.), Receptions of Greek and Roman antiquity in East Asia. Brill, 73-87.

Inoue, M. (1965). Nihonshi. 4th ed. Rev. Tokyo: Gakuseisha.

Kanayama, Y. Y. (2017). The birth of philosophy as 哲學 (Tetsugaku) in Japan.” Tetsugaku, 1, 169-183.

Kanokogi, K. (1918a). Chōetsuteki kokkashugi, gunkokushugi, teikokushugi 超越的国家 主義、軍国主義、帝国主義. Chūgai shinron 中外新論, 2(2), 16-26.

Kanokogi, K. (1918b). “Zentaishugi” 全体主義. Teiyū Rinrikai rinri kōenshū丁酉倫理会倫理 講演集, 187, 1-30.

Kim, B.-K., & Vogel, E. F. (Eds.) (2011). The Park Chung Hee era: The transformation of South Korea. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

Kim, H.-A., & Sorensen, C. W. (Eds.) (2011). Reassessing the Park Chung Hee era, 1961-1979. Center for Korea Studies. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

Liu, J. (2019). Translating and rewriting western classics in China (1920s-1930s): The case of the Xueheng journal. In Almut-Barbara Renger and Xin Fan (Eds.), Receptions of Greek and Roman antiquity in East Asia. Brill, 91-111.

Makeham, J. (2020). Lost soul: ‘Confucianism’ in contemporary Chinese academic discourse. Brill.

Maruyama, M. (1963). Thought and behaviour in modern Japanese Politics. London: Oxford University Press.

Matsuura, M. 松浦正孝. (2010). Daitōa sensō wa naze okita no ka: Han-Ajiashugi no keizaishi 大東亜戦争はなぜ起きたのか: 汎アジア主義の経済史. Nagoya: Daigaku Shuppankai.

Miyamoto, M. 宮本盛太郎. (1984). Shūkyōteki ningen no seiji shisō: Abe Isoo to Kanokogi Kazunobu no baai 宗教的人間の政治思想: 阿部磯雄と鹿子木員信の場合. Tokyo: Bokutakusha.

Myers, B. B. (2011). The cleanest race: How North Koreans see themselves and why it matters. Brooklyn, NY: Melville House.

Neary, I. (2002). The state and politics in Japan. Cambridge, Oxford and Malden: Polity Press.

Osedo, H. (1973). The political thought of Kita Ikki: The logical link between his critique of the national polity and his advocacy of war. Doctoral Thesis, The University of British Columbia.

Pan, W., ed. (2009). Zhongguo Moshi (‘The China Model’). Zhongyang bianyi chubanshe.

Shin, G. (2006). Ethnic nationalism in Korea: Genealogy, politics and legacy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Skya, W. A. (2009). Japan’s holy war: The ideology of radical Shinto ultranationalism. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

Szpilman, C. W. A. (2013). Kanokogi Kazunobu: Pioneer of Platonic fascism and imperial Pan-Asianism. Monumenta Nipponica, 68(2), 233-280.

Tankha, B. (2006). Kita Ikki and the making of modern Japan: A vision of empire. Folkstone, Kent: Global Orient.

Tetsuo, N. (1974). Japan: The intellectual foundation of modern Japanese politics.  Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Totten, G. O. (1966). The social democratic movement in prewar Japan. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Waley-Cohen, J. (2000). The sextants from Beijing: Global currents in Chinese history. Norton & Co.

Wilson, G. M. (1969). Radical nationalist in Japan: Kita Ikki 1883-1937. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.


© Center for Open Access in Science