COAS
Center for Open Access in Science (COAS)
OPEN JOURNAL FOR EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH (OJER)

ISSN (Online) 2560-5313 * ojer@centerprode.com

OJER Home

2020 - Volume 4 - Number 2


The Effect of Blended Learning on Academic Achievement and Attitudes at Social Studies Courses

Barış Çiftçi * barisciftci@nevsehir.edu.tr * ORCID: 0000-0002-3688-0359 * ResearcherID: ABI-1980-2020
Nevsehir Haci Bektas Veli Universty, Education Faculty, Nevsehir, TURKEY

Open Journal for Educational Research, 2020, 4(2), 143-150 * https://doi.org/10.32591/coas.ojer.0402.05143c
Received: 18 August 2020 ▪ Accepted: 15 December 2020 ▪ Published Online: 31 December 2020

LICENCE: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ARTICLE (Full Text - PDF)


ABSTRACT:
As a result of scientific and technological developments reflection, improvements on education science moved from teacher centered to student and learning centered system. Learning concept is not only seen a at schools and some learning centers but in all areas and places of life. The aim of this study is to search the achievement and persistency of blended learning method at social studies lesson. With the empirical method used at research, the impact of independent variable examined on experimental group is blended learning method. The independent variable used at control group is face to face learning method. The impact of same dependent variable has been searched on experimental and control group. As a dependent variable the results of social studies academic success test has been searched. For the determined dependent variables, between groups assessment has been applied according to pre-test and post-test scores. The experimental application of the research has been applied to 52 students at 7th grade. 26 students take place from experimental group and 26 students take place from control group. According to the findings, no difference has been found between pre-test scores. According to post test and persistency test a significant difference has been appeared in favor of experimental group which is blended learning method. According to repeated measures analyses results between pre-test and post-test, and between post-test and persistency test; comparison of pre-test and post-test, both effect the student achievement. But according to impact results; the effect of blended learning is larger. According to post-test and persistency score results; it came out that for the persistency of knowledge blended learning is more effective than face to face learning. According to the results of persistency test and final application which is a comparison of blended learning and face to face learning, blended learning group is more effective than face to face learning group. While face to face learning group final application score lessen 12 points, blended learning group score lessen 8 points. It can be confessed that according to the persistency of student achievement, blended learning method is more effective than face to face learning method.

KEY WORDS: blended learning, academic achievement, social studies.

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:
Assit. Prof. Dr. Barış Çiftçi, Nevsehir Haci Bektas Veli Universty, Education Faculty, Nevsehir, TURKEY. E-mail: barisciftci@nevsehir.edu.tr.


REFERENCES:

Akyol, Z. (2009). Examining teaching presence, social presence, cognitive presence, satisfaction and learning in online and blended course contexts. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis. Ankara: Ortadoğu Teknik Üniversitesi.

Aladejena, F. (2009). Blended learning and technology-assisted teaching of biology in Nigerian secondary schools. Special Edition of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science (pp. 133-140). San Francisco, USA.

Altinişik, S., & Orhan, F. (2002). Sosyal bilgiler dersinde çoklu ortamin öğrencilerin akademik başarilari ve derse karşi tutumlari üzerindeki etkisi [The effect of multimedia in social studies course on students' academic achievement and attitudes towards the course]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 23, 41-49.

Boyle, T., Bradley, C., Chalk, P., Jones, R., & Pickard, P. (2003). Using blended learning to improve student success rates in learning to program. Journal of Educational Media, 28(2-3), 165-178.

Colesca, S. E., Dobrica, L., & Alpopi, C. (2009). Students outcomes and perceptions in a blended learning format. Metalurgia International, 14(8), 222-229.

Cüez, T. (2006). İlköğretim 8. siniflarda fen bilgisi dersinde web tabanli öğretim desteğinin öğrenci başarisina etkisi [The effect of web-based instruction support on student achievement in primary education 8th grade science lesson], Master Thesis. İzmir: Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü.

Çelik, E. (2007). Ortaöğretim coğrafya derslerinde bilgisayar destekli animasyon kullaniminin öğrenci başarisina etkisi [The effect of using computer-assisted animation in secondary school geography lessons on student achievement], Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Marmara Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü.

Delialioğlu, Ö. (2004). Effectiveness of hybrid instruction on certain cognitive and affective learning outcomes in a computer networks course, Doctoral Thesis. Ankara: ODTÜ Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.

Demirel, A. (2006). Sanat eğitiminde bilgisayar ve çoklu ortam uygulamalari [Computer and multimedia applications in art education], Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Selçuk Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.

Demirli, C. (2002). Web tabanlı ögretimin ögretim teknolojileri ve materyal gelistirme dersinde ögrenci basarısına etkisi (f.ü. teknik egitim fakültesi örnegi) [The effect of web-based instruction on student success in instructional technologies and material development course (technical education faculty example)],Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Elazıg: Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.

Doo, L, Michael, M., & Virginia, K. (2006). Online vs. blended learning: Differences in instructional outcomes and learner satisfaction. http://robinwofford.wiki.westga.edu/file/view/EJ842695.pdf.

El-Deghaidy, H., & Nouby, A. (2008). Effectiveness of a blended e-learning cooperative approach in an egyptian teacher education programme. Computers & Education, 51, 988-1006.

Frederickson, N., Reed, P., & Clifford, V. (2005). Evaluating web-supported learning versus lecture-based teaching: Quantitative and qualitative perspectives. Higher Education,50, 645-664.
Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet & Higher Education, 7.
Gültekin, K. (2006). Çoklu ortamin bilgisayar programlama başarisi üzerine etkisi [The effect of multimedia on computer programming success], Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.

Kert, S. B., & Tekdal, M. (2004). Literatürdeki tasarim ilkelerine uygun olarak hazirlanmiş multimedya ders yaziliminin lise düzeyi fizik öğretiminde akademik başariya ve kaliciliğa etkisi [The effect of multimedia course software prepared in accordance with the design principles in the literature on academic achievement and retention in high school physics education]. XIII National Educational Sciences Congress, 6-9 July 2004. İnönü Üniversitesi, Malatya.

Lesh, S. G. (2000). Web-based learning: A Kirkpatrick’s multilevel evaluation of effectiveness (Dissertation abstracts online). 1 August 2003, OCLC, http://FirstSearch.oclc.org (taken from database).

Olapiriyakul, K., & Scher, J. M. (2006). A guide to establishing hybrid learning courses: Employing information technology to create a new learning experience and a case study. Internet and Higher Education, 9, 287-301.

Pereira, J.A., Pleguezuelos, E., Merı’, A., Ros, A. M., Carmen, M., Toma’s, M., & Masdeu, C. (2007). Effectiveness of using blended learning strategies for teaching and learning human anatomy. Medical Education, 41, 189-195.

She, H. S., & Fisher, D. (2003). Web-based e-learning environments in Taiwan: The impact of the online science flash program on students’ learning. In M. Swe (Ed.), Technology-rich learning environments (pp. 343-364). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company, Incorporated.
Şahin, T. Y. (2000). İlköğretim sosyal bilgiler dersinde çoklu ortamlarin etkililiği [Effectiveness of multimedia in primary education social studies lesson]. Eğitim Araştırmaları, 1(1), 68-73.

Taşçi, G. (2006). Biyoloji öğretiminde çoklu ortam uygulamalarinin öğrenme başarisina etkisi [The effect of multimedia applications on learning achievement in biology teaching], Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.

Tuckman, B. W. (2002). Evaluating ADAPT: A hybrid instructional model combining web-based and classroom components. Computers and Education, 39, 261-269.

Tutaysalgir, H. (2006). Powerpoint sunu programiyla hazirlanan sosyal bilgiler dersi öğretim materyalinin öğrenci tutum ve performanslarina etkisi [The effect of the social studies lesson teaching material prepared with powerpoint presentation program on student attitudes and performance], Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Afyon: Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.


 

© Center for Open Access in Science