COAS
Center for Open Access in Science (COAS)
OPEN JOURNAL FOR EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH (OJER)

ISSN (Online) 2560-5313 * ojer@centerprode.com

OJER Home

2021 - Volume 5 - Number 2


Early Mathematics Learners’ Numerical Errors: Consequence of Poor Learners’ Comprehension and Teachers’ Instructions

Anass Bayaga * anassb@mandela.ac.za * ORCID: 0000-0003-0283-0262
Nelson Mandela University, Faculty of Education, Gqeberha, SOUTH AFRICA

Ndamase Nzuzo * bayamg2@gmail.com
University of Fort Hare, Faculty of Education, East London, SOUTH AFRICA

Michael J.  Bossé * bossemj@appstate.edu
Appalachian State University, Department of Mathematical Sciences, Boone North Carolina, UNITED STATES

Open Journal for Educational Research, 2021, 5(2), 275-288 * https://doi.org/10.32591/coas.ojer.0502.11275b
Received: 21 May 2021 ▪ Accepted: 23 August 2021 ▪ Published Online: 15 December 2021

LICENCE: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ARTICLE (Full Text - PDF)


ABSTRACT:
While the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is still considered as a pandemic in recent human history, evidence from World Health Organization (2021) so far has recorded a total of 116,521,281 confirmed cases of COVID-19 with 2,589,548 as a total of deaths from over 215 countries or territories worldwide. Recognizing that COVID-19 is not only pandemic since March 11, 2020, but spreading worldwide at unprecedented rate, number of sectors including schools and universities as a measure to minimize person-to-person transmission closed their services. Such an uncertain closure warranted restructuring of services provided by schools and universities. The challenges therefore have necessitated the current research to investigate and alleviate challenges brought about by the COVID-19. In essence, the present research’s aim was to report on early mathematics learners (foundation phase) numerical errors, which is as a consequence of poor learners’ comprehension and teachers’ instructions. Based on the aim, the study was positioned within a cognitive theory in order to examine processing of numerical competence among early mathematics learners. A case study via 80 grade 3 learners with ages 8 and 9 was sampled. A textual analysis was used in unpacking and de-contextualizing processing of numerical competence by early mathematics learners. The evidence revealed learners’ mathematical mistakes were caused from limited reading skills and ill-presented problems via teachers. Due to the need to teach children at home (home school) due to the COVID-19, it is hoped that the findings thus assist audience, including non-academic and parents, who grapple with poor instructions coupled with poor learners’ comprehension.

KEY WORDS: numerical competence, foundation phase, computational competence, mathematical errors.

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:
Anass Bayaga, Nelson Mandela University, Faculty of Education, Gqeberha, SOUTH AFRICA. E-mail: anassb@mandela.ac.za.


REFERENCES:

Adams, D. M., McLaren, B. M., Durkin, K., Mayer, R. E., Rittle-Johnson, B., Isotani, S., & van Velsen, M. (2014). Using erroneous examples to improve mathematics learning with a web-based tutoring system. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 401-411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.053.

Archibald, S. (2009). Spatial abilities and mathematics achievement – A review. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 11, 257-269.

Bogdan, K., & Biklen, H. (2003). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Booth, J. L., Barbieri, C., Eyer, F., & Paré-Blagoev, E. J. (2014). Persistent and pernicious errors in algebraic problem-solving. The Journal of Problem Solving, 7(1), 3-15. https://doi.org/10.7771/1932-6246.1161

Booth, J. L., McGinn, K. M., Barbieri, C., & Young, L. K. (2017). Misconceptions and learning algebra. In and the rest is just algebra, Ed., Sepideh Stewart, Springer Nature Switzerland AG. 235-238.

Broaders, S. C., Cook, S. W., Mitchell, Z., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2007).      Making children gesture brings out implicit knowledge and leads to learning. J. Exp. Psychol. 136, 539-550. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.136.4.539

Chu, M., Meyer, A., Foulkes, L., & Kita, S. (2014). Individual differences in frequency and saliency of speech-accompanying gestures: the role of cognitive abilities and empathy. J. Exp. Psychol. 143, 694-709. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033861

Congdon, E. L., Kwon, M. K., & Levine, S. C. (2018). Learning to measure through action and gesture: children’s prior knowledge matters. Cognition, 180, 182-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.07.002

Congdon, E. L., Novack, M. A., Brooks, N., Hemani-Lopez, N., O’Keefe, L., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2017). Better together: Simultaneous presentation of speech and gesture in math instruction supports generalization and retention. Learn. Instr. 50, 65-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.03.005

Cotton, T. (2010). Understanding and teaching primary mathematics. Retrieved on 12 Feb 2019. http://www.pearsoned.co.uk/cotton.

Creswell, J. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). London. Sage Publications.

Durkin, K., & Rittle-Johnson, B. (2015). Diagnosing misconceptions: Revealing changing decimal fraction knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 37, 21-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.08.003

Gordon, R., & Ramani, G. B. (2021). Integrating embodied cognition and information processing: A combined model of the role of gesture in children’s mathematical environments. Front. Psychol. 12:650286. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.650286

Gordard, F. (2005). Children and number difficulties in learning mathematics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

Jarvin, A. (2009). Help your class to develop their knowledge and understanding of numbers with thought-provoking activities. Retrieved on 20 July 2019. Available on www.scholastic.co.UK/juniorEdplus.

McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2006). Research education: Evidence-based inquiry (6th ed.). United States of America. Pearson Education, Inc.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Murray, F. (2011). Mathematics achievement of children in the United States. Learner Dev, 61(4), 25-26.

Özer, D., & Göksun, T. (2020). Visual-spatial and verbal abilities differentially affect processing of gestural vs. spoken expressions. Lang. Cogn. Neurosci. 35, 896-914. https://doi.org/0.1080/23273798.2019.1703016

Pardesi, T. (2008). Identifying errors in children’s mathematical thinking and methods of remediation. University of South Africa. University Press.

Ping, R. M., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2008). Hands in the air: using ungrounded iconic gestures to teach children conservation of quantity. Dev. Psychol. 44, 1277-1287. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.44.5.1277

Ramani, G. B., Jaeggi, S. M., Daubert, E. N., & Buschkuehl, M. (2017). Domain-specific and domain-general training to improve kindergarten children’s mathematics. J. Numerical Cogn. 3, 468-495. https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.v3i2.31

Rhoads, C. L.,Miller, P. H., & Jaeger, G. O. (2018). Put your hands up! Gesturing improves preschoolers’ executive function. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 173, 41-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2018.03.010

Sethole, G., Gaba, B., Adler, A., & Vithal, R. (2006). Fine-tuning a language of description for mathematics items which incorporate the everyday. Cape Town. Brill Sense.

Shalem, Y., & Sapire, I. (2012). Teachers’ knowledge of error analysis. Johannesburg: Saide.

Strauss, K., & Corbin, H. (1990). Basics of grounded theory methods. Beverly Hills, CA., Sage.

UNESCO (2020). Empowering students with disabilities during the COVID-19 crisis. Glob. Educ. Coalition. https://en.unesco.org/covid19/educationresponse/globalcoalition.

Van der Ven, S. H., Kroesbergen, E. H., Boom, J., & Leseman, P. P. (2012). The development of executive functions and early mathematics: a dynamic relationship. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 82, 100-119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02035.x

Verschaffel, L., Depaepe, F., & Mevarech, Z. (2019). Learning mathematics in metacognitively oriented ICT-based learning environments: a systematic review of literature. Educ. Res. Int. 2019. Article 3402035.

Wakefield, E. M., Congdon, E. L., Novack, M. A., Goldin-Meadow, S., & James, K. H. (2019). Learning math by hand: The neural effects of gesture-based instruction in 8-year-old children. Attent. Percept. Psychophys. 81, 2343-2353. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01755-y

Wakefield, E. M., Novack, M. A., Congdon, E. L., Franconeri, S., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2018). Gesture helps learners learn, but not merely by guiding their visual attention. Dev. Sci. 21, e12664. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12664

Wertsch, D. (1990). The voice of rationality in a sociocultural approach to mind. In L. C. Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology (pp. 175-205). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Wertsch, F., Hagstrom, H., & Kikas, G. (1995). Voices of thinking and speaking. In Martin, L., Nelson, K. & Tobach, E., (Eds.) Sociocultural psychology: Theory and practice of doing and knowing (pp. 276-292). New York, NY, Cambridge University Press.

Wiebe, S. A., Espy, K. A., & Charak, D. (2008). Using confirmatory factor analysis to understand executive control in preschool children: I. latent structure. Dev. Psychol. 44, 575-587. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.44.2.575

World Health Organisation (2021). Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard. WorldHealth Orgnisation. https://covid19.who.int/table.

Xenidou-Dervou, I., De Smedt, B., van der Schoot, M., & van Lieshout, E. C. (2013). Individual differences in kindergarten math achievement: The integrative roles of approximation skills and working memory. Learn. Individ. Differ. 28, 119-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.09.012

Yang, C. W., Sherman, H., & Murdick, N. (2011). Error pattern analysis of elementary school aged students with limited English proficiency. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 4(1), 50-67.

Zheng, X., Swanson, H. L., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2011). Working memory components as predictors of children’s mathematical word problem solving. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 110, 481-498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2011.06.001

© Center for Open Access in Science