OJER Home

2021 - Volume 5 - Number 2

Exploring the Effect of STEM Education on the Motivations and Epistemological Beliefs Related to Science Among Talented and Gifted Students

Dilara Akpınar * akpnrdilara@gmail.com * ORCID: 0000-0002-5020-7152
Erzincan Binali Yildirim University, Erzincan, TURKEY

Sema Altun Yalçın * saltun_11@hotmail.com * ORCID: 0000-0001-6349-2231
Erzincan Binali Yildirim University, Erzincan, TURKEY

Open Journal for Educational Research, 2021, 5(2), 317-332 * https://doi.org/10.32591/coas.ojer.0502.14317y
Received: 21 October 2021 ▪ Accepted: 7 December 2021 ▪ Published Online: 27 December 2021

LICENCE: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ARTICLE (Full Text - PDF)

ABSTRACT:
The research is aimed to explore the effect of STEM education on the motivations and epistemological beliefs related to science among talented and gifted students. A mixed research method was employed in collecting the data of the research. The sample of the research consisted of 20 5th and 6th grade students who were diagnosed to be talented. Before the activities, the Epistemological Beliefs Questionnaire and the Motivation Scale for Science Learning were applied to the students. The reflective journals were asked to fill in reflective journals after each activity and individual interviews were conducted after all activities were completed. A significant difference was found between the Epistemological Beliefs Questionnaire and the Motivation Scale for Science Learning pre-test and post-test scores at the end of the research. With the conducted interviews and results from the journals, positive changes were observed in students’ self-confidence, motivation, and attitudes towards science lessons in training.

KEY WORDS: STEM, epistemological beliefs, motivation scale for science learning, gifted students.

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:
Dilara Akpınar, Erzincan Binali Yildirim University, Science Institute, Erzincan, TURKEY. E-mail: akpnrdilara@gmail.com.

REFERENCES:

American Association for Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.

Akbaba, S. (2006). Eğitimde Motivasyon. Kazım Karabekir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 13, 343.

Akgündüz, D., Aydeniz, M., Çakmakçı, G., Çavaş, B., Çorlu, M. S., Öner, T., & Özdemir, S. (2015). STEM Eğitimi Türkiye Raporu: Günün Modası Mı Yoksa Gereksinim mi? İstanbul: Aydın Üniversitesi. Retrieved 15 March 2021, from https://www.aydin.edu.tr/tr-tr/akademik/fakulteler/egitim/Documents/STEM%20E%C4%9Fitimi%20T%C3%BCrkiye%20Raporu.pdf.

Altun, Yalçın, S. (2019). The effect of integrated STEM education on teachers and the opinions of teachers. Journal of Social, Humanities and Administrative Sciences, 20(5), 948-963.

Aşut, N. (2013). Relationship of gifted students’ epistemological beliefs with science achievement and motivation towards science learning. Unpublished master’s thesis, İnönü University Institute of Education Sciences.

Aşut, N., & Köksal, M. (2015). Relationship of gifted students’ epistemological beliefs with achievement and motivatıon towards science learning. Journal of Düzce University Institute of Social Sciences, 2(1), 22-44.

Aydın, M. (2011). Fen ve Teknoloji öğretmenleri için geliştirilen proje tabanlı öğretim yöntemi konulu bir destek programının etkilerinin araştırılması. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Karadeniz Teknik University.

Banks, F., & Barlex, D. (2020). Teaching STEM in the secondary school: Helping teachers meet the challenge. Routledge.

Barış, N., & Ecevit, T. (2019). STEM education for gifted student. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(1), 217-233.

Bircan, M. A., & Köksal, Ç. (2020). Investigation of STEM attitudes and STEM career interests of gifted students. Turkish Journal of Primary Education, 5(1), 16-32.

Bråten, I., & Ferguson, L. E. (2014). Investigating cognitive capacity, personality, and epistemic beliefs in relation to science achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 36, 124-130.

Bybee, R. W. (2011). Scientific and engineering practices in K-12 classrooms: Understanding a framework for K-12 science education. Science and Children, 49(4), 10-16.

Camcı Erdoğan, S. (2014). The effect of differentiated science and technology instruction based on scientific creativity on gifted and talented students’ achievement, attitude and creativity. Istanbul University (Doctoral dissertation, PhD Dissertation, Institute of Educational Sciences, Istanbul).

Can, A. (2016). SPSS ile bilimsel araştırma sürecinde veri analizi[Data analysis in the scientific research process with SPSS]. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. Sixth Edition. New York.

Conley, A. M., Pintrich, P. R., Vekiri, I., & Harrison, D. (2004). Changes in epistemological beliefs in elementary science students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 186-204.

Cresswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed method research. London: Sage Publications.

Çakır, Z., & Altun-Yalçın, S. (2021). The investigation of the effect of Montessori approach-based STEM activities on the problem-solving skills of pre-service preschool teachers. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi [Journal of Theoretical Educational Science], 14(2), 93-119.

Çakır, Z., & Altun Yalçın, S. (2021). The effects of Montessori approach based STEM activities on pre-service teachers’ attitudes towards science and science teaching. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 17(35), 1895-1924. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.831879

Çalik, H., & Altun Yalçın, S. (2022). The effect of stem and stem-based robotics activities on constructive learning environments opinions of teacher candidates. IBAD Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, (12), 137-163. https://doi.org/10.21733/ibad.948455

Çepni, S. (2018). Kuramdan uygulamaya STEM eğitimi [STEM education from theory to practice] (2nd edition). Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayınları.

Deryakulu, D., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2005). Epistemolojik inanç ölçeğinin faktör yapısının yeniden incelenmesi: Cinsiyet ve öğrenim görülen program türüne göre epistemolojik inançların karşılaştırılması. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 18, 57-70.

Dönmez, M.C. (2020). Robotik Uygulamaların Aday Öğretmenlerin STEM Farkındalıkları, Fen Öğretmeye Yönelik Öz Yeterlikleri ve Stem’e Yönelik Tutumları Üzerine Etkileri. Unpublished masters’thesis,  Kırşehir Ahi Evran University.

Dönmez, İ., & Yalmancı-Yücel, S. Y. (2020). Analysis of scientific epistemological beliefs and STEM attitudes of the gifted students. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 9(3), 515-526.

Ercan, S., & Şahin, F. (2015). The Usage of Engineering Practices in Science Education: Effects of design based science learning on students’ academic achievement. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, l(9), 128-164.

Gonzalez, H. B., & Kuenzi, J. J. (2012). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education: A primer. Congressional Research Service.

Güldemir, S., & Çınar S. (2017). Fen bilimleri öğretmenleri ve ortaokul öğrencilerinin STEM etkinlikleri hakkındaki görüşleri. ULEAD 2017 Annual Congress: ICRE, 280-286.

Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, A. (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. Washington: National Academies Press.

Hoover, S. M. (1989). The Purdue three stage model as applied to elementary science for the gifted. School Science and Mathematics, 89(3), 244-50.

İdin, Ş., & Kayhan, N. (2016). European Union countries and primary period gifted-talented students for special education practices in Turkey. Journal of Kirsehir Education Faculty, 17(2), 17-31.

Johnson, R., & Onwuegbuzie, A. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26.

Kahyaoğlu, M., & Pesen, A. (2013). The relationship between gifted students’ attitudes towards science and technology and their learning and motivation styles. Journal of Giftedness and Education, 3(1), 38-49.

Kanlı, E., & Özyaprak, M. (2016). Stem education for gifted and talented students in Turkey. Journal of Gifted Education Research, 3(2), 1-10.

Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM education, 3(1), 1-11.

Kennedy, T., & Odell, M. (2014). Engaging students in STEM education. Science Education International, 25(3), 246-258.

Koştur, H. İ. (2017). The history of science practices in stem education: Al-Jazari example. Başkent University Journal of Education, 4(1), 61-73.

Krefting, L. (1991). Rigor in qualitative research: The assessment of trustworthiness. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45(3), 214-222.

Kurnaz, A., & Barışık, C. Ş. (2018). Examination of relationship between gifted students’ motivational beliefs and creative thinking skills in science course. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 47(220), 59-78.

Lacey, T. A., & Wright, B. (2009). Occupational employment projections to 2018. Monthly Labor Review, 82-109.

Lin, T. J., Deng, F., Chai, C. S., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). High school students’ scientific epistemological beliefs, motivation in learning science, and their relationships: A comparative study within the Chinese culture. International Journal of Educational Development, 33(1), 37-47.

Maryland State STEM Standards of Practice. (2012). Maryland STEM: Innovation today to meet tomorrow’s global challenges. Retrieved on 22 April 2021, from http://mdk12.msde.maryland.gov/instruction/academies/marylandstatestemstandardsofpractice_.pdf.

Mellat, N., & Lavasani, M. G. (2011). The role of epistemological beliefs, motivational constructs and Information processing strategies in regulation of learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 1761-1769.

Miedijensky, S., & Tal, T. (2016). Reflection and assessment for learning in science enrichment courses for the gifted. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 50, 1-13.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.

Moomaw, S. (2013). Teaching STEM in the early years: Activities for integrating science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Redleaf Press.

National Research Council (NRC). 2011. A framework for K–12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

National Academy of Engineering and National Research Council [NAE & NRC] (2009). Engineering in K-12 education: Understanding the status and improving the prospects. Washington: National Academies Press.

NGSS Lead States (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

National Research Council (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Research Council.

Ozan, F., & Uluçınar Sağır, Ş. (2020). The effect of stem implementation on attitude towards stem and success in “measurement of force and friction” class. Journal of Kazım Karabekir Education Faculty, 41, 260-275.

Özçelik, A., & Akgündüz, D. (2018). Üstün/özel yetenekli öğrencilerle yapılan okul dışı STEM eğitiminin değerlendirilmesi. Trakya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(2), 334-351.

Öztürk, S. C., & Altun Yalçın, S. (2020). STEM eğitiminin fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının problem çözme becerilerine etkisi. Turkish Studies – Education, 15(4), 2893-2915. https://dx.doi.org/10.47423/TurkishStudies.43707

Pape, S. J., & Smith, C. (2002). Self-regulating mathematics skills. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 93-101.

Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(6), 459-470.

Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., & Boyle, R. A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63(2), 167-199.

Ricco, R., Schuyten Pierce, S., & Medinilla, C. (2010). Epistemic beliefs and achievement motivation in early adolescence. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 30(2), 305-340.

Sak, U. (2011). An overview and social validity of the education programs for talented students’ model (EPTS). Education and Science, 36(161), 213-229.

Sanders, M. (2009). STEM, STEM education, STEM mania. The Technology Teacher, 68(4), 20-26.

Schommer, M. (1990). Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(3), 498.

Schommer, M. (1998). The influence of age and education on epistemological beliefs. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68(4), 551-562.

Schommer-Aikins, M. (2002). Epistemological belief system. Personal epistemology: The Psychology Of Beliefs About Knowledge And Knowing, 105-118.

Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. (Eds.) (2011). Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance. Taylor & Francis.

Seren, S., & Veli, E. (2018). 2005 yılı itibariyle değişen fen bilimleri dersi öğretim programlarında STEM eğitimine yer verilme düzeylerinin karşılaştırılması [Comparison of different levels of including STEM education in science curriculum modified since 2005]. Journal of STEAM Education, 1(1), 24-47.

Steenbergen-Hu, S., & Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2017). Factors that contributed to gifted students’ success on STEM pathways: The role of race, personal interests, and aspects of high school experience. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 40(2), 99-134.

Tal, T., Krajcik, J. S., & Blumenfeld, P. C. (2006). Urban schools’ teachers enacting project‐based science. Journal Of Research İn Science Teaching, 43(7), 722-745.

Johnson, R. B., & Turner, L. A. (2003). Data collection strategies in mixed methods research. A. Tashakkori, and C. Teddlie (Ed.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 297-319).

Tuan, H. L, Chin, C. C., & Shieh, S. H. (2005). The development of a questionnaire tomeasure students’ motivation towards science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 27(6), 639-654.

Yamak, H., Bulut, N., & Dündar, S. (2014). 5. Sınıf öğrencilerinin bilimsel süreç becerileri ile fene karşı tutumlarına FeTeMM etkinliklerinin etkisi. Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 34(2), 249-265.

Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2011). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Seçkin Yayınevi: Ankara.

Yılmaz, H., & Çavaş Huyugüzel P. (2007). Reliability and validity study of the students’ motivation toward science learning (smtsl) questionnaire. İlköğretim Online, 6(3), 430-440. http://ilkögretim-online.org.tr.