OJLS Home

2020 - Volume 3 - Number 2

The Voice of the Child: Are the Procedural Rights of the Child Better Protected in the New Brussels II Regulation?

Slađana Aras Kramar * saras@pravo.hr * ORCID: 0000-0002-8908-775X
University of Zagreb, Faculty of Law, Zagreb, CROATIA

Open Journal for Legal Studies, 2020, 3(2), 87-98 * https://doi.org/10.32591/coas.ojls.0302.01087а
Received: 9 April 2020 ▪ Accepted: 9 July 2020 ▪ Published Online: 25 July 2020

LICENCE: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ARTICLE (Full Text - PDF)

ABSTRACT:
The procedural rights of children in civil court proceedings, and in particular the right of children to be heard in such proceedings, play a significant and growing role in international, European and national context. At the EU level, the growing relevance of the procedural rights of the child has shaped the Brussels II system, originally adopted in the Council Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000 of 29 May 2000, now in the Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility. Recently, the Brussels II system has been the subject of a second recast aimed at better protection of the best interest of the child, including the right to be heard in these matters. The new Regulation II ter will start to apply from 1 August 2022. In this paper, the importance and role of the right of the child to be heard in the Brussels II bis Regulation will be analyzed and discussed, taking into account the jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the EU. Following that, the impact of the right of the child to be heard on the second recast of the Brussels II System will be evaluated. Last but not least, the paper will try to answer the question of what we have achieved with the new Brussels II ter Regulation in proceedings on parental responsibility from a child rights-based approach.

KEY WORDS: right to express an opinion, child, parental responsibility, Brussels II Regulation, recast, procedure.

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:
Slađana Aras Kramar, Ph.D., Associate Professor, University of Zagreb, Faculty of Law, Department for Civil Procedure, CROATIA. E-mail: saras@pravo.hr.

REFERENCES:

Aras Kramar, S., & Milas Klarić, I. (2017). The main challenges of implementing the procedural rights of the child in the family justice systems of some Southeast European countries. In T. Liefaard & J. Sloth-Nielsen (Eds.), The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child: Taking stock after 25 years and looking ahead (pp. 247-271). Leiden/Boston: Brill/Nijhoff.

Bainham, A. (2005). Children – The modern law, 3rd ed. Bristol: Family Law.

Carpaneto, L. (2019). Impact of the best interests of the child on the Brussels II ter Regulation. In E. Bergamini & C. Ragni (Eds.), Fundamental rights and best interests of the child in transnational families (pp. 265-285). Cambridge/Antwerp/Chicago: Intersentia.

Committee on the Rights of the Child (2009). General Comment No. 12 (2009) on the Right of the Child to be Heard (CRC/C/GC/12). Geneva: Committee on the Rights of the Child. Retrieved 2 April 2020, from https://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/CRC/Pages/CRCIndex.aspx.

Committee on the Rights of the Child (2013). General comment No. 14 (2013) on the right of the child to have his or her best interests taken as a primary consideration (art. 3, para. 1) (CRC/C/GC/14). Geneva: Committee on the Rights of the Child. Retrieved 2 April 2020, from https://www2.ohchr.org/English/bodies/crc/docs/GC/CRC_C_GC_14_ENG.pdf.

Council of Europe (2010). Guidelines of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on child-friendly justice. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing. Retrieved 7 April 2020, from https://rm.coe.int/16804b2cf3.

Daly, A., & Rap, S. (2019). Children’s participation in the justice system. In U. Kilkelly & T. Liefaard (Eds.), International human rights of children (pp. 299-319). Singapore: Springer.

Distefano, M. (2019). The best interests of the child principle at the intersection of private international law and human rights. In E. Bergamini & C. Ragni (Eds.), Fundamental rights and best interests of the child in transnational families (pp. 157-170). Cambridge/Antwerp/Chicago: Intersentia.

European Commission (2014). Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee on the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000, COM(2014) 225 final. Brussels: European Commission. Retrieved 2 April 2020, from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM:2014:0225:FIN.

European Commission (2015). Study on the assessment of the Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 and the policy options for its amendment; Final report; Analytical Annexes. Brussels: European Commission, Directorate-General for Justice and Consumers. Retrieved 2 April 2020, from https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/924728ec-9148-11e8-8bc1-01aa75ed71a1.

European Commission (2016a). Commission staff working document, Impact assessment, Accompanying the document – Proposal for a Council Regulation on jurisdiction, the recognition and enforcement of decision in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, and on international child abduction (recast), SWD(2016) 207 final. Brussels: European Commission. Retrieved 2 April 2020, from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52016SC0207&from=EN.

European Commission (2016b). Proposal for a Council Regulation on jurisdiction, the recognition and enforcement of decision in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, and on international child abduction (recast), COM(2016) 411 final. Brussels: European Commission. Retrieved 8 April 2020, from https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/rep/1/2016/EN/1-2016-411-EN-F1-1.PDF.

Fortin, J. (2003). Children’s rights and the developing law. London: LexisNexis.

FRA – European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (2015). Child-friendly justice. Perspectives and experiences of professionals on children’s participation in civil and criminal judicial proceedings in 10 EU Member States. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

FRA – European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (2017). Child-friendly justice. Perspectives and experiences of children involved in judicial proceedings as victims, witnesses or parties in nine EU Member States. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

Franzina, P. (2019). The place of human rights in the private international law of the Union in family matters. In E. Bergamini & C. Ragni (Eds.), Fundamental rights and best interests of the child in transnational families (pp. 141-155). Cambridge/Antwerp/Chicago: Intersentia.

Kilkelly, U. (2011). Using the Convention on the Rights of the Child in law and policy: Two ways to improve compliance. In A. Invernizzi & J. Williams (Eds.), The human rights of children. From visions to implementation (pp. 179-197). Farnham/Burlington: Ashgate.

Kraljić, S. (2018). Družinski zakonik s komentarjem in podrobnim pojasnili [Family Code with commentary and detailed explanations]. Maribor: Poslovna založba MB, založništvo d.o.o.

Liefaard, T., & Sloth-Nielsen, J. (2017). 25 Years CRC: Reflecting on successes, failures and the future. In T. Liefaard & J. Sloth-Nielsen (Eds.), The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child: Taking stock after 25 years and looking ahead (pp. 1-13). Leiden/Boston: Brill/Nijhoff.

Stalford, H. (2012). Children and the European Union. Rights, welfare and accountability. Oxford/Portland: Hart Publishing.

Stalford, H., & Drywood, E. (2001). Using the CRC to inform EU Law and policy-making. In A. Invernizzi & J. Williams (Eds.), The human rights of children. From visions to implementation (pp. 199-218). Farnham/Burlington: Ashgate.  
----------------------
Council of Europe, (European) Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, 4 November 1950. Retrieved 7 April 2020, from https://www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=basictexts&c=.

Council of Europe, European Convention on the Exercise of Children’s Rights, 25 January 1996, ETS No. 160. Retrieved 7 April 2020, from https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/treaty/160.

European Union, Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Official Journal of the EU 2012, C 326, pp. 391-407. Retrieved 8 April 2020, from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:12012P/TXT&from=EN.

European Union, Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Official Journal of the EU 2012, C 326, pp. 47-199. Retrieved 8 April 2020, from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=OJ:C:2012:326:FULL&from=EN.

European Union, Council Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001 of 28 May 2001 on cooperation between the courts of the Member States in the taking of evidence in civil or commercial matters, Official Journal of the EC 2001, L 174, pp. 1-24. Retrieved 8 April 2020, from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32001R1206&from=EN.

European Union, Council Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000 of 29 May 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and in matters of parental responsibility for children of both spouses, Official Journal of the EC 2000, L 160, pp. 19-36. Retrieved 8 April 2020, from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32000R1347&from=EN.

European Union, Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000, Official Journal of the EU 2003, L 338, pp. 1-29. Retrieved 8 April 2020, from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32003R2201&from=EN.

European Union, Council Regulation (EU) 2019/1111 of 25 June 2019 on jurisdiction, the recognition and enforcement of decisions in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, and on international child abduction, Official Journal of the EU 2019, L 178, pp. 1-115. Retrieved 8 April 2020, from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32019R1111&from=EN.

Hague Conference on Private International Law, Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, 25 October 1980. Retrieved 8 April 2020, from https://www.hcch.net/en/instruments/conventions/full-text/?cid=24.

UN General Assembly, UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, 20 November 1989, 44/25. Retrieved 2 April 2020, from https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/crc.aspx.

Court of Justice of the EU, C-491/10 PPU, Aguirre Zarraga v Simone Pelz. Retrieved 8 April 2020, from http://curia.europa.eu/juris/liste.jsf?language=en&num=C-491/10.