COAS
Center for Open Access in Science (COAS)
OPEN JOURNAL FOR LEGAL STUDIES (OJLS)

ISSN (Online) 2620-0619 * ojls@centerprode.com

OJLS Home

2021 - Volume 4 - Number 1


A Critical Examination of Breeders’ Monopoly Rights to the Detriment of Farmers’ Rights Under the Ethiopian Plant Breeders’ Rights Law

Temesgen Abebe Degu * timatimdegu@yahoo.com * ORCID: 0000-0002-7139-2369 * ResearcherID: AAL-1142-2021
Wachemo University, School of Law, Hosaena, ETHIOPIA

Open Journal for Legal Studies, 2021, 4(1), 19-30 * https://doi.org/10.32591/coas.ojls.0401.02019d
Received: 20 January 2021 ▪ Accepted: 4 April 2021 ▪ Published Online: 1 June 2021

LICENCE: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ARTICLE (Full Text - PDF)


ABSTRACT:
Ethiopia adopted plant breeders’ rights proclamation in 2006 to provide recognition and economic reward for breeders for their effort and investment so as to encourage their involvement in the sector. At the same time, the proclamation aims to ensure that the farming and pastoral communities of Ethiopia, who have been conserving and continue to do so in the future the agro-biodiversity resource used to develop new plant varieties, continue to their centuries old customary practice of use and exchange of seed. This article aims at investigating the extent to which the proclamation accommodates its stated objective by giving adequate recognition to farmers’ rights. The investigation adopts a qualitative method by analyzing both primary materials and secondary sources. The article concludes that the Ethiopian plant breeders’ rights proclamation fails to adequately incorporate farmers’ rights beyond its preamble.

KEY WORDS: breeders’ rights, farmers’ rights, IPRs, monopoly rights, patent.

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:
Temesgen Abebe Degu, Wachemo University, School of Law, Hosaena, ETHIOPIA. E-mail: timatimdegu@yahoo.com.


REFERENCES:

Access to Genetic Resources and Community Knowledge, and Community Rights Proclamation (2006), Proclamation No. 482/2006, Federal Negarit Gazette, 13th Year, No. 13, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

African Model Legislation for the Protection of the Rights of Local Communities, Farmers and Breeders, and for the Regulation of Access to Biological Resources (2000), OAU, Algeria.

Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS), (1994), Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization, Annex 1C, 1869 U.N.T.S. 299, 33 I.L.M., 1197, WTO.

Convention on Biological Diversity (1992). UN Doc. 1760 UNTS 79; 31 ILM 818, UN Earth Summit, Rio de Janeiro.

Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) (1983). International undertaking for plant genetic resource, Resolution 8/83, Report of the Conference of FAO, 22nd Sess., Doc. C83/REP, FAO.

Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) (1989). Agreed interpretation of the international undertaking. Resolution 4/89, Report of the Conference of FAO, 25th Sess., Doc. C89/REP, FAO.

International Convention for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (UPOV) (1978). Paris 2 December 196, as Revised at Geneva on November 10, 1972, and on October 23, 1978, UPOV Doc.

International Convention for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (UPOV) (1978). Paris 2 December 196, as Revised at Geneva on 19 March 1991, UPOV Doc. 221(E), 1996.

Plant Breeders’ Rights Proclamation (2006). Proclamation No. 481/2006, Federal Negarit Gazette, l2th Year No. 12, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Seed Proclamation (2000), Proclamation No. 206/2000, Federal Negarit Gazette, 6th Year, No. 36, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

The Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights Act (2001), No. 53/2001, Gazette of India, Extraordinary Part II-Section 1, Ministry of Law, Justice and Company Affairs, India.

United Nations Sub-Commission on Human Rights (2001). Intellectual property and human rights, Resolution 2001/21, UN Doc. E/CN.4/Sub.2/RES/2001/21, UN.

Alston, J. M. et al. (1998). Financing agricultural research: International investment patterns and policy perspectives. World Development, 26(6), 1057-1071.

Blakeney, M. (2007). Plant variety protection, international agricultural research, and exchange of germplasm: Legal aspects of sui generis and patent regimes.In A. Krattiger et al. (Eds.), Intellectual property management in health and agricultural innovation: A handbook of best practices. MIHR, Oxford.

Chaturvedi, S. (2002). Agricultural biotechnology and new trends in IPRs regime: Challenges before developing countries. Economic & Political Weekly, 37(13), 1212-1222.

Cullet, P. (2001). Plant variety protection in Africa: Towards compliance with the TRIPS Agreement. Journal of African Law, 45(1), 97-122.

Cullet, P. (2003). Food security and intellectual property rights in developing countries. IELRC Working paper 2003-3, International Environmental Law Research Center, Geneva, p. 8.

IELRC Working paper 2003-3, International Environmental Law Research Center, Geneva.

Feyissa, R. (2006). Farmers rights in Ethiopia. A case study. Background Study 5, FNI Report 7/2006, Farmers Rights Project.

Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (2000). The state of food and agriculture. Agricultural and Development Economics Working Papers, Version 32, FAO [Available at http://www.fao.ore/docrep/x4400e/x4400e00.htm].

Genetic Resource Action International (GRAIN) (1999). Plant variety protection to feed Africa? Rhetoric versus reality [Available at http://www.grain.org/article/entries/13-p1ant-variety-protection-to-feed-africa-rhetoric-versus-reality].

Godden, D. (1984). Plant breeders’ rights and international agricultural research. Food Policy, 9(3), 206-218.

Hamilton, N. D. (2001). Legal issues shaping society’s acceptance of biotechnology and genetically modified organisms. Drake Journal of Agricultural Law, 6(1), 81-117.

Juma, C. (1999). Intellectual property rights and globalization. Implications for developing countries. Science, Technology and Innovation Discussion Paper No. 4, Center for International Development, Harvard University, Cambridge.

Leskien, D., & Flitner, M. (1997). Intellectual property rights and plant genetic resources: Options for a sui generis system. Issues in Genetic Resources No. 6, International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Italy.

Pottage, A., & Sherman, B. (2007). Organisms and manufactures: On the history of plant inventions. Melbourne University Law Review, 31(2), 539-568.

Ragavan, S. (2005). To sow or not to sow. Dilemmas in creating new rights in food. University of Oklahoma       [Available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract id=791666].

Ramanna, A. (2002). Policy implications of India’s patent reforms: Patent applications in the post-1995 era. Economic & Political Weekly, 37(21), 2065-2075.

Rangnekar, D. (2001). Access to genetic resources, gene-based inventions and agriculture. Study Paper 3a, Commission on Intellectual Property Rights.

Robinson, J. (1999). Ethics and transgenic crops: A review. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology, 2(2), 71-81.

Singh, H. (2007). Plant variety protection and food security: Lesson for developing countries. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 12(4), 391-399.

Thorpe, P. (2002). Study on the implementation of the TRIPS Agreement by developing countries. Study Paper 7, Commission on Intellectual Property Rights.

Tripp, R. et al. (2007). Plant variety protection in developing countries: A report from the field. Food Policy, 32(3), 354-371.


© Center for Open Access in Science