OJLS Home

2021 - Volume 4 - Number 1

Towards Safeguarding Rural Communities’ Social and Economic Interests Through Communal Property Law

Werner Schoeman * werner.schoeman@ul.ac.za
University of Limpopo, School of Law, Polokwane, SOUTH AFRICA

Mashele Rapatsa * mashele.rapatsa@ul.ac.za * ORCID: 0000-0002-8848-3240
University of Limpopo, School of Law, Polokwane, SOUTH AFRICA

Open Journal for Legal Studies, 2021, 4(1), 31-44 * https://doi.org/10.32591/coas.ojls.0401.03031s
Received: 28 May 2021 ▪ Accepted: 23 August 2021 ▪ Published Online: 16 September 2021

LICENCE: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ARTICLE (Full Text - PDF)

ABSTRACT:
South Africa’s incessant Corporate Law Reforms do offer vast opportunities for rural communities to be actively involved in their own social and economic development. This article discusses the practicability of using a private company to promote and develop social and economic interests of rural communities. The fundamental question is: what constitute proper administration and socio-economic development in a rural context? It takes into account, the fact that the post-1994 democratic dispensation has made some effort to develop and strengthen the constitutional property rights, and the social and economic development of the previously disadvantaged rural communities. This encompassed the idea of, somewhat, relying on civil society institutions to manage and develop property rights of rural communities. Nonetheless, it should be noted that the success thereof is dubious since the development and operation of civil society institutions in these communities are constantly under threat and undermined by the tenacity of conflicts between administrators and the traditional leadership. It is asserted that there is an incessant need to resolve fundamental aspects relating to law, application of legal norms and achievement of social justice in a rural context.

KEY WORDS: communal property interests, corporate law reform, socio-economic development, rural development, constitutional transformation.

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:
Mashele Rapatsa, University of Limpopo, School of Law, Department of Public and Environmental Law, Polokwane, SOUTH AFRICA. E-mail: mashele.rapatsa@ul.ac.za

REFERENCES:

Carey Millar, D.  (2000). A land title in South Africa.Cape Town: Juta Publishers.

Department of Rural Development and Land Reforms, 2011/2012 Annual Report 80. Land Affairs (1997). White Paper on Land Policy.

Kloppers, H., & Pienaar, G. J. (2014). The historical context of land reform in south africa and early policies. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 17(2), 676-706.

Jebe, R. (2015). Sustainability reporting and new governance: South Africa marks the path to improved corporate disclosure. Cardozo Journal of International and Company Law, 23(2), 233-293.

Salamon, L. M. (ed.) (2002). The tools of government: A guide to the new governance. Oxford University Press.

Peet, R., & Watts, M. (1993). Introduction: Development theory and environment in an age of market triumphalism. Economic Geography, 69(3), 227-253.

Pienaar, G. (1986). Ontwikkelings in die Suid-Afrikaanse Eiendomsbegrip in Perspektief. Journal of South African Law (TSAR), 3(1), 295-308.

Pienaar, G. (2008). The inclusivity of communal land tenure: a redefinition of ownership in Canada and South Africa? Electronic Journal of Comparative Law, 12(1), 1-17.

Pienaar, G. (2009). Aspects of land administration in the context of good governance. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 12(2), 15-55.

Pienaar, G. (2009). Regulating communal land rights: The story continues. Journal for Contemporary Roman-Dutch Law (THRHR), 72(1), 1-16.

Schnegg, M., & Linke, T. (2015). Living institutions: Sharing and sanctioning water among pastoralists in Namibia. World Development, 68, 205-214.

Schoeman, W. (2018). The use of a private company to promote and develop the property interests of rural communities. LLM dissertation, University of Limpopo.

Van der Merwe, C. G. (1989). Sakereg. Durban: Butterworths Publishers.

Van der Walt, A. J. (2000). Civil forfeiture of instrumentalities and proceeds of crime and the constitutional property clause. South African Journal on Human Rights, 16(1), 1-45.

Van der Walt, A. J. (2004). Striving for the better interpretation – A critical reflection on the Constitutional Court’s Harksen and FNB decisions on the property clause. South African Law Journal, 121, 854-866.

Van der Walt, A. J. (2011). Constitutional property law. Cape Town: Juta Publishers.