OJLS Home

2023 - Volume 6 - Number 2

General Provisions of Digital Property Law and How to Categorize Digital Assets

Roman Maydanyk * ORCID: 0000-0003-1661-0535
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, School of Law, Kyiv, UKRAINE

Open Journal for Legal Studies, 2023, 6(2), 49-64 * https://doi.org/10.32591/coas.ojls.0602.02049m
Received: 26 October 2023 ▪ Revised: 15. December 2023 ▪ Accepted: 31 December 2023

LICENCE: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ARTICLE (Full Text - PDF)

ABSTRACT:
This article deals with general provisions of digital property law and categorization of digital assets. Distributed data storage technologies and their applications have created a market for digital assets, forming a new intangible, digital type of property. The formation of digital property law, which is becoming increasingly important, is based on the functional approach of implementing digital assets as property into the law, which necessitates a rethinking and transformation of property law, similar to the transition from exclusively tangible objects of property rights to intangible objects such as intellectual property, as well as from securities and documents of title (bill of lading, bill of exchange) in paper form to fully dematerialized securities, electronic documents of title, and online accounts as property. The transformation of property law for the purposes of digital assets is based on the implementation of new, sui generis property rights and the extension of rules on property rights to objects that were not previously objects of law or were created for obligatory claims, as a result of which objects arising from actual or contractual relations acquire a in rem and quasi-in rem legal regime. Starting with an overview of the concepts of property law of digital assets, the article then discusses the concept of property, and then the concept of digital assets, their nature and classification of the main types of digital assets as property. The formation of digital property law inherent in modern law is a global trend characterized by the gradual recognition of certain types of digital assets as property and the creation of functional equivalents of possession, legal titles and remedies that are inherent in traditional property law, taking into account the intangible nature of digital assets. The author of this research starts with an overview of the general provisions of property law and digital property law, the article then discusses general provisions categorizing of digital assets, and categorizing types of digital assets.

KEY WORDS: digital property law, digital assets, categorizing digital assets.

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:
Roman Maydanyk, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, School of Law, Kyiv, UKRAINE.

REFERENCES:

Allen, J. G., Rauchs, M., Blandin, A., & Bear, K. (2020). Legal and regulatory considerations for digital assets. University of Cambridge. Access: https://www.jbs.cam.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/2020-ccaf-legal-regulatory-considerations-report.pdf.

Bridge, M., Gullifer, L., Low, K., & McMeel, G. (2021). The law of personal property (3rd Ed.).

Bollen, R. (2016). The legal status of online currencies are bitcoins the future? Access: https://ru.scribd.com/document/536348131/SSRN-id2285247.

Chang, R., & Hsiung, E. (n.d.). Taiwan blockchain. URL: https://www.legal500.com/guides/vhapter/taiwan-blockchain/?export-pdf.

Civil Code of the Republic of Moldova (2019). Law No. 133 of 15.11.2018: enters into force on 01.03.2019 – Chisinau: Farmec-Lux, 2019 (F.E.-P. “Tipografia Centrala”) - 640 p.

Cvetkova, I. (2018). Cryptocurrencies legal regulation. BRICS Law Journal, 5(2), 128-153. https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2018-5-2-128-153

Đurić, Đ., & Jovanović, V. (2023). New regulation of digital assets for future business – Case of Serbia. AGORA International Journal of Juridical Sciences, No. 1, 7-16. http://univagora.ro/jour/index.php/aijjs.

Elliott, S. (2018). Bitcoin: The first self-regulating currency? LSE Law Review, 57 https://storage.googleapis.com/jnl-lse-j-lselr-files/journals/1/articles/23/submission/proof/23-1-45-1-10-20191015.pdf.

Fairfield, J. (2005). Virtual property. Boston University Law Review,1047.

Fillmann, A. (2020). German law aspects of crypto assets. The National Law Review. April 2, 2020. URL: https://www.natlawreview.com/article/german-law-aspects-crypto-assets#:~:text=Under%20German%20civil%20law%2C%20it,of%20sections%20903%20et%20subq.

Finck, M. (2018). “Blockchain Technology”: Blockchain Regulation and Governance in Europe (Cambridge University Press). Access: https://assets.cambridge.org/97811084/74757/frontmatter/9781108474757_frontmatter.pdf.

Finck, M. (2018). CleanApp, “Defining Cryptolaw”. Medium, 28 September 2018. https://medium.com/cryptolawreview/cryptolaw-9410cf7a8fd4.

Fox, D. (2018). Cryptocurrencies in the common law of property. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3232501

Gameblog: Second life and the virtual property boom (2005). Guardian Unlimited (14 June 2005).

Gray, K. (1991). Property in thin air. Cambridge Law Journal,251.

German Law Aspects of Crypto Assets. The National Law Review. September 12, 2023. Volum XIII, Number 255. Access: https://www.natlawreview.com/article/german-law-aspects-crypto-assets.

Law of Ukraine (2023). Dated 10.08.2023 N 3320-IX On Amendments to the Civil Code of Ukraine to Expand the Range of Civil Rights Objects. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3320-IX#Text.

Legal statement on cryptoassets and smart contracts. UK Jurisdiction Taskforce (2019). The LawTech Delivery Panel, n. 67. November 2019. URL: https://www.blockchain4europe.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/6.6056_JO_Cryptocurrencies_Statement_FINAL_WEB_111119-1.pdf.

Lim, H. Y-F. (2005). Virtual world, virtual land but real property. Singapore Journal of Legal Studies,304.

Mirković, P. (2023). Digital Assets – A legal approach to the regulation of the new property law institute. Special Edition (pp. 17-31). https://doi.org/10.5937/ptp2300017M

Nekit, K. G. (2022). Virtual assets as a kind of digital things. JournalofCivilLaw. https://doi.org/10.32837/chc.v0i45.466

Nekit. K. (2020). Social media account as an object of virtual property. https://journals.muni.cz/mujlt/article/download/12298/11651/28166.

… (2018). Malta Virtual Financial Assets Act 2018 (VFAA), pt I art. 2 (2). Electronic Resource. – [Access Mode]: https://legislation.mt/eli/cap/590/eng/pdf.

Rahmatian, A. (n.d.). A Comparison of German Moveable Property Law and English Personal Property Law. Electronic Resource. – [Access Mode]: https://germanlawarchive.iuscomp.org/?p=340.

The Law Commission of England and Wales (2022). Digital assets Consultation paper. No 256. 28 July 2022. Available at: https://www.lawcom.gov.uk/project/digital-assets/.

Voisin, M., Hay, R., Le Vesconte, S., Quicke, S., & Wells, H. (2022). Digital assets and English private law: The highlights of our response to the Law Commission’s consultation. Access: https://www.linklaters.com/en/insights/blogs/fintechlinks/2022/october/digital-assets-and-english-private-law.

von Bahr, C. (2015). Gemeineuropäisches Sachenrecht Band 1: Grundlagen, Gegenstände sachenrechtlichen Rechtsschutzes, Arten und Erscheinungsformen subjektiver Sachenrechte. Gebundenes Buch. Verlag C. H. Beck. – s. 860.