COAS
Center for Open Access in Science (COAS)
OPEN JOURNAL FOR LEGAL STUDIES (OJLS)

ISSN (Online) 2620-0619 * ojls@centerprode.com

OJLS Home

2024 - Volume 7 - Number 1


The Influence of Basic Laws on Criminal Law and the Right to Remain Silent According to Israeli Supreme Court Rulings – A Brief Overview

Michael Pilyavsky * ORCID: 0009-0008-8669-5785
South-West University “Neofit Rilski”, Department of Philosophy, Blagoevgrad, BULGARIA

Open Journal for Legal Studies, 2024, 7(1), 9-14 * https://doi.org/10.32591/coas.ojls.0701.02009p
Received: 3 October 2023 ▪ Revised: 18 April 2024 ▪ Accepted: 26 April 2024

LICENCE: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ARTICLE (Full Text - PDF)


ABSTRACT:
The practice of “Privilege Against Self Incrimination” of secrecy against self-incrimination in all Western legal methods, including Israeli law, is seen as one of the human rights in general and part of the right to due process in particular. The constitutional revolution took place and with the enactment of the basic laws of human dignity and freedom, which established several human rights, among them is the right to remain silent, which is considered a right derived from the Basic Law of Human Dignity and Freedom.

KEY WORDS: human rights, Israeli basic laws, the right to remain silent.

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:
Michael Pilyavsky, South-West University “Neofit Rilski”, Department of Philosophy, Blagoevgrad, BULGARIA.


REFERENCES:

Barak, A. (1992). Protected fundamental rights. Israeli Law Journal Law and Government, vol. 9.

Barak, A. (1994). Interpretation of the Law, Constitutional Interpretation Journal, Volume 3 (1994 Ami 432-43318).

Gabbai, C. (2008). How did the income tax ordinance kill the right to remain silent? Israeli Journal “Misim”, Tel Aviv: Israel.

Galily, D. (2019). The expansion of the mind – An implementation of human intellectual progress to understand human history. In T. V. Petkova & V. S. Chukov (Eds.), 3rd International e-Conference on Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences: Conference Proceedings (pp. 225-240). Belgrade: Center for Open Access in Science. https://doi.org/10.32591/coas.e-conf.03.22225g

Gross, E. (1988). Is secrecy against self-incrimination a landmark in the enlightened man’s struggle for progress? Israeli Law Journal Legal Studies, Jerusalem: Israel.

Israeli Supreme Court ruling 3412/91 Sufian v. Commander of the IDF Forces in the Gaza Strip.

Israeli Court ruling 3734/92 Azazmi Fayed.

Israeli Penal Code, 1982.

Rothkopf, G. (2001). The need to redefine the areas of confidentiality against self-incrimination and the right to remain silent. Israeli Law Journal “HaMishpat”, Tel Aviv: Israel.

Ruling 2316/95, BSH 537/95 – Imad Ganimat v. The State of Israel, Supreme Court (4), 589, pp. 657-658.

Ruling 97:511 State of Israel v. Adnan Arada [Fedaur (page 4-5).

Ruling (TA) 10345/98 Rahmilevich v. State of Israel PsAm Tashnait (2) 12, 23.

The Israeli Basic Law: Human Dignity and Freedom.

Supreme Court 94/726 Clal Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Minister of Finance (1) 463, 441.

© Center for Open Access in Science