OJPR Home

2020 - Volume 4 - Number 2

Dynamic Psycho-Linguistics: Impact of the Social Interaction System in the Individual Psycholinguistic Prototype

Silva Ibrahimi * ibrahimi.silva@gmail.com * ORCID: 0000-0003-3233-1157 * ResearcherID: N-5693-2018
Albanian University, Department of Psychology, Tirana, ALBANIA

Elisabeta Kafia
Albanian University, Department of Psychology, Tirana, ALBANIA

Vera Ostreni Halili
Albanian University, Department of Medical Sciences, Tirana, ALBANIA

Ervin Ibrahimi
Security Council and Health Adviser, ITALY

Open Journal for Psychological Research, 2020, 4(2), 77-84 * https://doi.org/10.32591/coas.ojpr.0402.01077i
Received: 2 May 2020 ▪ Accepted: 1 September 2020 ▪ Published Online: 27 September 2020

LICENCE: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ARTICLE (Full Text - PDF)

ABSTRACT:
Speaking is a cognitive-motor activity apparently simple, which differentiates men from other animals and is made possible by a vast network of cerebral, cortical and subcortical structures. Language implies the relationship of the human being to his world while Psycholinguistics is the dynamic language process that leads to a mutual connection with the world external and with the other, which is other than self. In the history of Albanian psycho-pedagogical thinking there are evidences that reveal the efforts and contributions to understand and interpret the phenomena and problems directly related to the development and education of students of different school ages. The discussion of complex linguistic topics, communication and relationships is related not only to the exhaustion of the definition, but also the ability to take into consideration the circumstances that make them a social-ethnic reference system with the contribution of main references such as linguistic psychology, philosophy of language, linguistics and semiotics, cognitive level analysis and phenomenological aspects in a daily dimension, but also in the form of meanings, concept of reciprocity, social connotation and the dynamic process in the whole.

KEY WORDS: psycholinguistics, communication, psycho-pedagogical thinking, formation of psycho-linguistic construct.

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:
Silva Ibrahimi, Albanian University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology and Research Center, Tirana, ALBANIA. E-mail: silva.ibrahimi@yahoo.it.

REFERENCES:

Blatt, S. J., & Luyten, P. (2009) Psychopathology: Two polarities of experience across the life span, Development and Psychopathology, 21, 793-814.

Blatt, S. J., & Shichman, S. (1983). Two primary configurations of psychopathology. Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought, 6, 187-254.

Blatt, S. J., Stayner, D., Auerbach, J. S., & Behrends, R. S. (1996). Change in object and self-representation in long term, intensive, inpatient treatment of seriously disturbed adolescents and young adults. Psychiatry, 59, 82-107.

Caligor, E., & Clarkin, J. F. (2010). An object relations model of personality and personality pathology. In J. F. Clarkin, P. Fonagy & G. O. Gabbard (Eds.), Psychodynamic psychotherapy for personality disorders. A clinical handbook (pp. 3-35). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.

Freud S. (1932). Introduzione alla psicoanalisi (nuova serie di lezioni). In Opere, Italian Ed., Vol. 11, Boringhieri, Torino 1979, pp.121-284, referred Freud 1920.

Gazzillo, F., Gordon, R. M., Lingiardi, V., Del Corno, F., Bornstein, R. F., & McWilliams, N. (2014). Empirical research with Psychodynamic Diagnostic Prototype (PDP) and the Psychodiagnostic Chart (PDC): Towards PDM-2. National Meeting of American Psychoanalytic Association, New York, pp. 14-19.

Gecas, V., & Burke, P. J. (1995). Self and identity. In Comparing psychological and sociological approaches to identity: Identity status, identity capital and the individualization process, Cote’ E. J. & Schwartz J. S., Journal of Adolescence, 2002, 25, 572-586.

Heidegger, M. (1976). Essere e Tempo. Eleventh edition, pp. 27, pp. 42, pp.128, pp. 182 (A cura di Pietro Chiodi) Longanesi & C., Milano.

House, R. J. (1977). A 1976 theory of charismatic leadership. In J. G. Hunt & L. L. Larsen (Eds.), Leadership: The cutting edge. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

Humbolt, W. von. (2000). La diversità delle lingue, Roma-Bari, Laterza.

Kernberg, O. F., & Caligor, E. L. (2005). A psychoanalytic theory of personality disorders. In J. F. Clarkin & M. F. Lenzenweger (Eds.), Major theories of personality disorder (Second Edition, pp. 114-156). New York: Guilford.

Koeelen, J. A., Luyten, P., Eurelings Bontekoe, L. H., Diguer, L., Vermote, R., Lowyck, B., & Bühring, M. E. (2012). The impact of level of personality organization on treatment response: A systematic review. Psychiatry, 75(4), 355-374.

Livesley, W. J. (2003-2004). Practical management of personality disorder. New York: Guilford Press.

Marcia, J. E. (1966). Development and validation of ego identity status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 551-558.

McWilliams, N. (2011). The psychodynamic diagnostic manual: An effort to compensate for the limitation sof descriptive psychiatric diagnosis. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93(2), 112-122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2011.542709

Skodol, A. E., & Bender, D. S. (2003). Why are women diagnosed borderline more than men? The Psychiatric Quarterly, 74(4), 349-360.

Safran, J. D., Muran, J. C., & Eubanks Carter, C. (2011). Repairing alliance ruptures. Psychotherapy, 48(1), 80-87.