OJRE Home

2020 - Volume 3 - Number 2

Economic Contribution of Non-Timber Forest Products in Rural Livelihood of Dolakha, Nepal

Sabina Maharjan * sabinamhr12@gmail.com * ORCID: 0000-0002-8715-9369
Singhania University, School of Science, Rajasthan, INDIA

Megh R. Dangal * megh@ku.edu.np * ORCID: 0000-0002-3067-7405
Kathmandu University, School of Arts, NEPAL

Open Journal for Research in Economics, 2020, 3(2), 55-66 * https://doi.org/10.32591/coas.ojre.0302.01055m
Received: 31 May 2020 ▪ Accepted: 19 July 2020 ▪ Published Online: 17 September 2020

LICENCE: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ARTICLE (Full Text - PDF)

ABSTRACT:
Non-timber forest products (NTFP) are reported to have significant contribution in household economy supporting their subsistence. The study focuses on the share of NTFPs income in household income along with other sources. Forty-six households were sampled to carry out the targeted study. To analyze the contribution of NTFPs in household income, structured household questionnaires were designed for quantitative data and focus group discussion and key informant interview was conducted to obtain in-depth information guided by a checklist of questions. The major NTFPs found in the study area are Asparagus, Terminalia chebula, Phyllanthus, Terminalia bellerica, Edgeworthia (Argeli), Daphne (Lokta), Swertia (Chiraito), Taxus, Cinnamomum, mushrooms, firewood, and bamboo. Ninety six percent of community is involved in NTFPs collection either for subsistence or income. The study reveals that the agriculture share the highest income of 45.65% and NTFPs share 26.08% to average monthly income of household. District Forest Office and middlemen made CFUGs collect the NTFPs according to the prevailing market demand for which the collectors are paid certain amount. However, these days there is less demand of NTFPs collection as they are not getting the market for the collected NTFPs and do not have idea regarding the market demands to cultivate those products.

KEY WORDS: Non-timber forest products, economic contribution, livelihood, biodiversity conservation, Nepal.

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:
Megh Raj Dangal, Associate Professor, Kathmandu University, School of Arts, Kathmandu, NEPAL. E-mail: megh@ku.edu.np.

REFERENCES:

AEC/FNCCI (2004). Trade pattern of non-timber forest products (NTFPs) in Jumla, Surkhet and Nepalgunj: Appropriate policy measures for business and trade enhancement. Federation of Nepalese Chambers of Commerce and Industry, Agro Enterprise Center, Nepal.

Anderson, J., Benjamin, C., Campbell, B., & Tiveau, D. (2006). Forests, poverty and equity in Africa: New perspectives on policy and practice. International Forestry Review, 8, 44-53.

Angelsen, A., & Wunder, S. (2003). Exploring the forest – Poverty link: Key concepts, issues and research implications. International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor, Indonesia.

Babulo, B. Muys, B., Nega, F., Tollens, E., Nyssen, J., Deckers, J., Mathijs, E., (2008). Household livelihood strategies and forest dependence in the highlands of Tigray, Northern Ethiopia. Agricultural Systems, 98 (2008), 147-155.

Bhattarai, N. (1997). Biodiversity-people interface in Nepal. In: Medicinal plants for forest conservation and health care. Non-wood forest product series, 11, 78-86.

Bhattarai, N., & Olsen, C. (2000). Towards a generic framework for investigating national importance of medicinal plant trade. In S. M. Amatya (Ed.), Proceedings of the third regional workshop on community based NTFP management, South and East Asian countries NTFPS network (SEAN) (pp. 336-346). Institute of Foresty, Pokhara, Nepal.

Chao, S. (2012). Forest peoples: Numbers across the world. Forest People Program, United Kingdom.

Chikamai, B. N., & Kagombe, J. (2002). Country report for Kenya. In Review and synthesis on the state of knowledge of Boswellia spp. and commercialization of Frankincense in the drylands of Eastern Africa, KEFRI, Nairobi, Kenya.

Duong, N. (2008). The role of non-timber forest products in livelihood strategies and household ecomomics in a remote upland village in the upper ca river basin, Nghe the Phoung. Journal of Science and Development, 1, 88-98.

Edwards, D. M. (1996). Non-timber forest products from Nepal: Aspect of the trade in medicinal and aromatic plants. FORESC Monograph 1/96, Forest Research and Survey Center, Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation, Kathmandu, Nepal.

FAO (1991). Forest industry: Crucial for overall socio-economic development. Unsylva, 42, 16-24.

Heubach, K. et al. (2011). The economic importance of non-timber forest products (NTFPs) for livelihood maintenance of rural West African communities: A case study from northern Benin. Ecological Economics, 70, 1991-2001.

Jagger, P. (2012). Environmental income, rural livelihoods, and income inequality in western Uganda. Forests, Trees and Livelihoods. https://doi.org/10.1080/14728028.2012.698846

Jimoh, S., Amusha, T., & Azeez, I. (2013). Population distributions and threats to sustainable management of selected non-timber forest products in tropical lowland rainforest of Southwestern Nigeria. Journal of Forest Resources, 24(1), 75-82.

Mahapatra, A., & Tewari, D. (2005). Importance of non-timber forest products in the economic valuation of dry deciduous forests of India. Forest Policy Economy, 7(3), 455-467.

Melaku, E., Ewnetu, Z., & Teketay, D. (2014). Non-timber forest products and household incomes in Bonga forest area, Southwestern Ethiopia. Journal of Forestry Research, 25(1), 215-223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-014-0447-0

Mulenga, P. B, Richardson, R. B, Mapemba, L., & Tembo, G. (2011). Contribution of non- timber forest products to rural income in Zambia. Policy synthesis food security research project Zambia. Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives, agricultural Consultative Forum, Lusaka, Zambia, http://www.aec.msu/fs2/zambia/Index.htm.

Olsen, C. S. (1998). The trade in medicinal and aromatic plants from central Nepal to northern India. Economic Botany, 52(3), 279-292.

Pimentel, D., McNair, M., Buck, L., Pimentel, M., & Kamil, J. (1997). The value of forests to world food security. Journal of Human Ecology, 25(1), 91-120.
PyiSoe, A., Yahia, O. A., Jurgen, P., & Rony, P. (2014). Distribution of forest income among rural households: A case study from Natma Taung national park, Myanmar. Forests, Trees and Livelihoods. https://doi.org/10.1080/14728028.2014.976597

Ros-Tonen, M. A. F. (2000). The role of non-timber forest products in tropical forest management. HolzalsRoh-und Werkstoff, 58, 196-201.

Saha, D., & Sundriyal, R. C. (2011). Utilization of non-timber forest products in humid tropics: Implications for management and livelihood. Forest Policy and Economics, 14, 28-40.

Shackleton, C., Shackleton, S., Buiten, E., & Bird, N. (2007). The importance of dry woodlands and forests in rural livelihoods and povery alleviation in South Africa. Forest Policy Economy, 9(5), 558-577.

Shaanker, R. U., Ganeshaiah, K. N., Krishnan, S., Ramya, R., Meera, C., Aravind, N. A. et al. (2004). Livelihood gains and ecological costs of non-timber forest product dependence: assessing the roles of dependence, ecological knowledge and market structure in three contrasting human and ecological settings in south India. Environmental Conservation, 31, 242–253.