COAS
Center for Open Access in Science (COAS)
OPEN JOURNAL FOR STUDIES IN HISTORY (OJSH)

ISSN (Online) 2620-066X * ojsh@centerprode.com

OJSH Home

2020 - Volume 3 - Number 1


Influences of the East on Early Christian Iconography

Maria Chumak * mariachumak.res@pondiuni.edu.in * ORCID: 0000-0003-2199-5011
Pondicherry University, School of Humanities, Department of Philosophy, Kalapet, INDIA

Open Journal for Studies in History, 2020, 3(1), 11-24 * https://doi.org/10.32591/coas.ojsh.0301.02011c
Received: 19 July 2020 ▪ Accepted: 25 August 2020 ▪ Published Online: 10 October 2020

LICENCE: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ARTICLE (Full Text - PDF)


ABSTRACT:
The Roman imperial cult is traditionally considered to have been the main root to have exerted a major influence on early Christian iconography. Numerous visual and original literary sources illustrate the replacement of the Roman and Greek deities by the characters of the newly born religion – that is, Christianity. After the legalization of Christianity in the Roman Empire, the honor given to the Roman Emperor was naturally shifted to Jesus Christ, in terms of worship. Establishing the capital of a remote province, such as the Eastern part of Tracie, was a strategic political decision. Roman and later Christian practices inevitably embraced the local cults and traditions. Consequently, both Eastern and Western traditions can be traced in the practices of the new religious faith of the Roman Empire. This paper investigates the major Eastern sources which are often underestimated, while they are present in the Paleo-Christian visuals of the first centuries of the Common Era (CE) in the Eastern territories of the Roman Empire. One of these is the Buddhist visual representations of Gandhara art, which was later endorsed by Manichaeism in order to facilitate the rapid propagation of Mani’s teaching. One can observe the oscillating movement of Greek visual representations from the East, with Greek sculptors and painters giving an iconic shape to the existing Buddhist tradition and later back to Christianity on Byzantine territory. These representations were later diluted in equal quantity in the style of Byzantine late antiquity and early medieval visuals.

KEY WORDS: Byzantine art, Byzantine studies, Early Christianity, Proto-Christian art, practical theology, Orthodox Christianity, comparative religions, Buddhism, Greco-Indian kingdoms, Gandhara art, liturgy and worship, history of religions, Manichaeism, symbolism.

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:
Maria Chumak, Pondicherry University, School of Humanities, Department of Philosophy, Kalapet, INDIA. E-mail: mariachumak.res@pondiuni.edu.in.


REFERENCES:

Coomaraswamy, A. K. (1927). The origin of the Buddha image. The Art Bulletin, 9(4), 287-329. Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3046550.

Damascene, John (n.d.). Apologia of St. John Damascene against those who decry Holy Images, Grand Rapids, MI: Christian Classics Ethereal Library Print Basis: London: Thomas Baker Part, par. 16, URL: http://www.ccel.org/ccel/damascus/icons.html.

Damascene, John (2015). On Holy Images (πρὸς τοὺς διαβάλλοντας τᾶς ἁγίας εἰκόνας). Thirty Chapters to Amphilochios, on the Holy Ghost. — Chap. xviii. Tr. Mary H. Allies, ed. Thomas Baker, London, 1898, Gutenberg Project,Release Date: 9 September 2015, [EBookn#49917].

Falser, M. (2015). The Graeco-Buddhist style of Gandhara – a ‘Storia ideologica’, or: how a discourse makes a global history of art. Journal of Art Historiography, 13.

Finot, L. (1924). L. de la Vallée Poussin, Indo-Européens et Indo-Iraniens: l’Inde jusque vers 300 av. J.-C.. Bulletin de l'École française d'Extrême-Orient, 24, 601–602.

Foucher, A. (1914). The Greek origin of the image of the Buddha. In The beginning of Buddhist art and other essays in Indian and Central-Asian archaeology, trans. L. A. Thomas and F. W. Thomas. London: Humphrey Milford.

Grabar, A. (1968). Christian iconography: A study of its origins. Washington DC: Princeton University Press.

Gupta N. S. (Ed.) (1984). Cultural history of Kapisa and Gandhara. Delhi: Sundeep Prakashan.

Kitzinger, E. (1954). The cult of images in the age before Iconoclasm. Dumbarton Oaks Papers, 8, 83-150. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1291064.

Kumar, R. (2007). Social and cultural history of ancient India population. New Delhi: Summit Enterprises.

Лосский В. Н., и Успенский Л. А. (2014). Смысл икон[The meaning of icons]; пер. с фр. В. А. Рещиковой, Л. А. Успенской. Православный Свято-Тихоновский гуманитарный университет: Эксмо, Москва.

Miravalle, M. I. (2006). IntroductiontoMary: TheheartofMariandoctrineanddevotion. Queenship Publishing, S.T.D.

Murray, C. (1982). Early Christian art and archaeology, Religion, 12, 167-173.

Reinach, T. (1903). Le sarcophage de Sidamara. Monuments et mémoires de la Fondation Eugène Piot, 9(2).

Rhys Davids, T. W. (trans.) (1890). The questions of King Milinda. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Rowland Jr., B. (1942). Gandhara and Late Antique Art: The Buddha Image. American Journal of Archaeology, 46(2), 223-236. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/499385.

Sebastiani, Breno Battistin (2019). Droysen’s concept of Hellenism between philology and history. Aitia, 5. Accessed on 23 October 2019. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/aitia/1336; https://doi.org/10.4000/aitia.1336

Tertullian (2016). Five books against Marcion, Chapter 22, 22:1-13, Ante-Nicene Fathers, Vol. 3, New Apostolic Bible, edited by Covenant.org,.

Трубецкой, Кн. Евгений (1965). Tри очерка о русской иконе. Умозрение в красках, два мира в древне-русской иконописи[Three essays on the Russian icon. Speculation in paints, two worlds in ancient Russian icon painting]. Paris, YMCA- Press.

Vatican Council II (2014). Lumen Gentium (Dogmatic constitution of the church), Austin Flannery, Liturgical Press, USA, Collegeville, No. 66.

 

© Center for Open Access in Science