COAS
Center for Open Access in Science (COAS)
OPEN JOURNAL FOR STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY (OJSP)

ISSN (Online) 2560-5380 * ojsp@centerprode.com

OJSP Home

2025 - Volume 9 - Number 2


A Critical Assessment of Internalist Theory of Epistemic Justification

Olusola Ayomide Asaju * ORCID: 0009-0000-5887-5617
Obafemi Awolowo University, Department of Philosophy, Ile-Ife, NIGERIA

Open Journal for Studies in Philosophy, 2025, 9(2), 51-64 * https://doi.org/10.32591/coas.ojsp.0902.01051a
Received: 15 June 2025 ▪ Revised: 19 August 2025 ▪ Accepted: 8 November 2025

LICENCE: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ARTICLE (Full Text - PDF)


ABSTRACT:
The paper examines Internalism as a theory of epistemic justification. Internalism in epistemology is the view that the basic requirement for knowledge justification is in the epistemic agent internal factor. The paper examines two of the mainstream objections against this theory of epistemic justification which are “The Problem of Stored Belief and The Problem of forgotten Evidence.” The paper then use one of the variants of internalism which is mentalism to provide a way out for internalism as a theory of epistemic justification as these two salient objections.

KEY WORDS: internalism, mentalism, justification, internal, external.

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:
Olusola Ayomide Asaju, Obafemi Awolowo University, Department of Philosophy, Ile-Ife, NIGERIA.


 

REFERENCES:

Alvin, G., “Internalism exposed” in The Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 96, No. 6, (1999): 271- 293.

Bergmann, M., Justification without awareness, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).

Bernecker, S., “Memory: A philosophical study”, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, (2010).

Bonjour, L., “The internalist conception of epistemic justification”, in Peter A. French et al. (eds.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy Vol. 5: Studies in Epistemology (Minneapolis: University of Minnes, 1980).

Bonjour, L., The structure of empirical knowledge, (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1985)

Bonjour, L., “The Indispensability of Internalism”, in Philosophical Topics, XXIX, 1 & II, (2001): 49-65.

Bonjour, L., “Externalist theories of empirical knowledge” in French P.A. et et al. (eds.)  Midwest Studies in Philosophy, Studies in Epistemology, Vol. 5 (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1980)

Bonjour, L., & Sosa. E., Epistemic justification: Internalism vs. externalism, foundationalism vs. virtues, (Melbourne: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2003).

Conee, Earl. “Propositional justification”, Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in Analytical Tradition, vol. 28, no. 1, (1980).

Feldman, R., & Conee, E., “Internalism defended”, American Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 38, No. 1, (2001): 1-18.

Feldman, Richard. “Justification Is Internal.” In Steup,,, and Sosa…(eds) Contemporary Debates in Epistemology Oxford: Blackwell Publishing,(2005): 270-284.

Frise, M., “Internalism and the Problem of Stored Beliefs” in Erkenntnis, 82, (2017): 285-304.

Goldman, A., “A causal theory of knowing” in Journal of Philosophy, 73, (1967): 350-372.

Goldman, G. “What is justified belief?” in Kim, J. & Sosa. E. (eds). Epistemology: An Anthology. (London: Blackwell, 2000).

Greco, J. “Justification is not internal” in Contemporary Debates in Epistemology, ed. Mathias Step up and Ernest Sosa (Blackwell Publishing Press, 2005).

Greco, J., “Internalism and epistemically responsible belief”, in Syntheses, 85, 1990. pp: 245-277.

Kim, K. “Internalism and externalism in epistemology” in American Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 30, No. 4, (1993): 21-43.

Wright, C.J.G., “Warrant for nothing and foundations for free?” In Proceeding of the Aristotelian Society, No. 78, Vol. 1 (2004): 167-212.

© Center for Open Access in Science