COAS
Center for Open Access in Science (COAS)
OPEN JOURNAL FOR SOCIOLOGICAL STUDIES (OJSS)

ISSN (Online) 2560-5283 * ojss@centerprode.com

OJSS Home

2020 - Volume 4 - Number 2


Examining the Role of Immigrant Carers in Care for Older People at Home: The Case of Istanbul

Hamza Kurtkapan * hamzakurtkapan@nevsehir.edu.tr * ORCID: 000-0001-9815-7337 * ResearcherID: AAL-3089-2020
Nevsehir Hacı Bektas Veli University, Health Services Vocational School, Nevsehir, TURKEY

Open Journal for Sociological Studies, 2020, 4(2), 93-102 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.32591/coas.ojss.0402.04093k
Received: 14 March 2020 ▪ Accepted: 28 May 2020 ▪ Published Online: 20 June 2020

LICENCE: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ARTICLE (Full Text - PDF)


ABSTRACT:
In the modern period, the prevalence of chronic diseases has increased among old people due to the extended lifespans. Accordingly, older people who need for continuous care support has received much more focus. This study examines the experiences of immigrant female carers who are employed in home-based long-term older people care. Specifically, this study evaluates immigrant carers’ daily life practices and relationships with older people. In addition, this study explores the scope of the immigrant carer model as an alternative to caring for older people in traditional and institutional care models. In the study, a qualitative case study has been used. Care takers who immigrant Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan have been interviewed between 15 September and 15 October 2018.  Snowball sampling method has been used to select interviewees from the abovementioned countries. All of the participants consist of women. The data has been analyzed in categorical content. The results show that a strong emotional bond has developed between immigrant caregivers and elderly people receiving care. At the same time, financial concerns were found to be the main factors contributing to the cares’ motivation. In this respect, it could be said that this model bears traces in both aspects of home-based older people care. This model could actually be considered to be an intermediate (buffer) mechanism that holds the characteristics of both traditional and modern care together.

KEY WORDS: sociology, social work, older people care, immigrant carers.

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:
Hamza Kurtkapan, Nevsehir Hacı Bektas Veli University, Health Services Vocational School, Nevsehir, TURKEY. E-mail: hamzakurtkapan@nevsehir.edu.tr.


REFERENCES:

Balcı, S., Atılgan, N., & Bulut, B. (2016). Examining the relationship among religious coping, burdens, and life satisfaction of those who care for the homebound elderly. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi, 36(2), 465-475. https://doi.org/10.16917/iusosyoloji.284549

Bilge, U., Elçioğlu, Ö., Ünalacak, M., & Ünlüoğlu, İ. (2014). Türkiye’de yaşlı evde bakım hizmetleri [Elderly home-care in Turkey]. Euras J Fam Med, 3(1), 1-8.

Canatan, A. (2018). Türkiye’de prefosyonel yaşlı bakımı [Professional elderly care in Turkey]. In İ. Tufan & M. Durak (Eds.), Gerontoloji II (pp. 187-201). Ankara: Nobel.

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed method approaches, 3rd Ed., London, SAGE Publications.

Eryurt, M. A. (2014). Türkiye’de yaşlı nüfus ve yaşlılık dönemiyle ilgili yaşam tercihleri [Lifestyle choices associated with the older people population in Turkey]. In M. Turgut & S. Feyzioğlu (Eds.), Türkiye aile yapısı araştırması tespitler ve öneriler (pp. 90-112). Ankara: Aile ve Sosyal Politikalar Bakanlığı, Aile ve Toplum Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü Yayınları.

Güven, S. (2016). Evde bakım hizmeti verme [Providing home care services]. In V. Kalınkara (ed.), Yaşlılık disiplinlerarası yaklaşım, sorunlar ve çözümler II (pp. 293-325). Ankara: Nobel.

Görgün-Baran, A. (2005). Yaşlı ve aile ilişkileri: Ankara örneği [Older people and family relations: The case of Ankara]. Ankara: TC. Başbakanlık Aile Araştırma Kurumu Yayınları, No: 127.

Kaçmazoğlu, H. B. (2017). Mübeccel Belik Kıray’ın sosyolojik görüşleri üzerine [On the socıologıcal opinions of Mübeccel Belı̇k Kıray]. Sosyoloji Konferansları, (55), 385-412.

Kalaycıoğlu, S., Tol, U.U., Küçükkural, Ö., & Cengiz, K. (2003). Yaşlılar ve yaşlı yakınları açısından yaşam biçimi tercihleri [Lifestyle preferences for the elderly and their relatives]. Ankara: Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Raporları.

Kalınkara, V. (2012). Temel gerontoloji, yaşlılık bilimi [The gerontology, science of old age]. Ankara: Nobel Yayın.

Klie, T., & Durak, M.  (2018). Yaşlı bakım kurumları [Older people care institutions]. In İ. Tufan & M. Durak (Eds.), Gerontoloji II (pp. 89-104). Ankara: Nobel.

Kurtkapan, H. (2018a). Community centers of local governments for retirees: The case of Istanbul. Journal of Aging and Long-Term Care, 1(3), 131-136.

Kurtkapan, H. (2018b). Kentte yaslilik ve yerel yonetim uygulamalari [Aging in the city and local government practices]. Ankara: Nobel Yayincilik.

Kurtkapan, H. (2019). Kentte yaşayan yaşlıların iyi oluş halleri [The status of wellbeing of the retirees living in the city: The case of Istanbul]. Turkish Studies Social Sciences, 14(1), 119-131.

Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. London: Pearson.

Oğlak, S. (2017). Yaşlı bakımında görünmeyen işgücü: aile bakımı ve ekonomik değeri [The value of informal caregiving on elderly care: As a shadow workforce]. Istanbul Gelişim University Journal of Social Sciences, 4(2), 73-87.

Özkul, M., & Kalaycı, I. (2018). Enformel bir iş ve istihdam alanı olarak yaşlı bakıcılığı: yaşlı yakınları ile bakıcı ilişkilerinde yaşanan sorunlar [Elderly care as an ınformal job and employment area: The problems between the relatıves of the elder and caregıver]. Süleyman Demirel University Visionary Journal, 9(20), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.21076/vizyoner.372115

Özmete, E., & Hussein (2017). Türkiye’de yaşlı bakım hizmetleri raporu: Avrupa’dan en iyi uygulama örnekleri̇ ve Türkiye için bir model tasarımı [Report on aged care services in Turkey: Design a model for best practice from Europe and Turkey]. Ankara: T.C. Aile ve Sosyal Politikalar Bakanlığı, T.C. Çalışma ve Sosyal Güvenlik Bakanlığı.

Palaz, F. S., & Adıgüzel, Y. (2016). Hollanda'daki göçmen Türklerin aktif yaşlanma tecrübeleri [Active aging experiences of immigrant Turks in the Netherlands]. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi, 36(2), 431-463. https://doi.org/10.16917/iusosyoloji.291223

Reichert, M., Naegele, G., & Durak, M. (2018). Uzun süreli bakım ihtiyaçları ve politikalar: Almanya örneği [Long-term care needs and policies: The case of Germany]. In İ. Tufan & M. Durak (Eds.), Gerontoloji II (pp. 105-129). Ankara: Nobel.

Stone, R. I., & Bryant, N. (2019). The politics of immigration: Who will care for grandma? Generations, 42(4), 50-56.

Şentürk, M., & Altan, R. B. (2015). Giris, Istanbul’da yaslilarin mevcut durumu arastirmasi [Introduction, current situation survey of older people in Istanbul]. In M. Şentürk & H. Ceylan (Eds.), Istanbul’da yaslanmak, Istanbul’da yaslilarin mevcut durumu arastirmasi (pp. 13-35). Istanbul: Acilim Kitap.

Şentürk, M., & Ceylan, H. (Eds.) (2015). Istanbul’da yaslanmak, Istanbul’da yaslilarin mevcut durumu arastirmasi [Aging in Istanbul, the current situation of the older people in Istanbul]. Istanbul: Acilim Kitap.

TAYA (Türkiye Aile Yapisi Araştirmasi) (2011). Türkiye’de aile yapisi araştirmasi 2011 [Turkeyfamily structure research 2011]. Ankara: Aile ve Sosyal Politikalar Bakanlığı & Afşar oğlu Matbaası.

United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA) (2015). World population ageing 2015 (ST/ESA/SER.A/390). New York: United Nations.

Wellin, C., & Jaffe, D. J. (2004). In search of “personal care”: Challenges to identity support in residential care for elders with cognitive illness. Journal of aging studies, 18(3), 275-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2004.03.005

World Health Organization [WHO] (2007). Global age-friendly cities: A guide. World Health Organization.

 

© Center for Open Access in Science