COAS
Center for Open Access in Science (COAS)
OPEN JOURNAL FOR SOCIOLOGICAL STUDIES (OJSS)

ISSN (Online) 2560-5283 * ojss@centerprode.com

OJSS Home

2022 - Volume 6 - Number 1


The Relevance of “Soft Power” and Hallyu’s Success in Romania

Valentina Marinescu * vmarinescu9@yahoo.com * ORCID: 0000-0002-9882-5902
University of Bucharest, Faculty of Sociology and Social Work, Bucharest, ROMANIA

Open Journal for Sociological Studies, 2022, 6(1), 15-26 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.32591/coas.ojss.0601.02015m
Received: 11 May 2022 ▪ Revised: 10 July 2022 ▪ Accepted: 12 July 2022

LICENCE: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ARTICLE (Full Text - PDF)


ABSTRACT:
The cultural and educational export of Hallyu in Romania offered an example in the success of teaching and learning Korean Studies in Romania. The on-line Korean Studies courses (2012-2017) which had been delivered to the Romanian students had enabled them to learn about different societies, acquiring the understandings about universal values and enhancing their knowledges about South Korea. As regards the dissemination of South Korea’s popular culture, the researches made between 2011 and-2017 showed that Romanian fans and general audiences of South Korea’s cultural products perceived and decoded Halluy as a cultural “mix” between the “local” (that is, South Korean) elements and the appeal at a set of “global” (universal) values. More precisely, in the case of Romanian audiences for Hallyu products (TV series and/or K-Pop music) there was a validation of theories regarding the cultural hybrid motivations involved in media consumption and theories emphasizing globalism and of these cultural products, making them desirable and wanted world-wide. The main conclusion of the article is that the audience of Hallyu in Romania is not a homogenous one but diverse and polyvalent. The success of Hallyu in this country is the result of the creative use of “Soft power” as a part of South Korea’s public diplomacy in Europe.

KEY WORDS: South Korea, Hallyu, Romania, audience, fans.

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:
Valentina Marinescu, University of Bucharest, Faculty of Sociology and Social Work, Bucharest, ROMANIA. E-mail: vmarinescu9@yahoo.com.


REFERENCES:

Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A. (1988). Comments on the motivational status of self‐esteem in social identity and intergroup discrimination. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18(4), 317-334. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420180403

Bauman, R. (2000). Language, identity, performance. Pragmatics, 10(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.10.1.01bau

Baym, N. K. 2000. Tune in, log on: Soaps, fandom, and online community. London and New York. Sage.

Bergen, H. N. (2011). Understanding Korean Society through Popular Music. Situations 5 (Winter 2011). Retrieved 13 March 2022, from http://situations.yonsei.ac.kr/product/data/item/1535538073/detail/3d8c1a769e.pdf.

Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The location of culture. London and New York. Routledge.

Bourdieu, P. (2016). Raisons pratiques, sur la théorie de l’action, Paris: Média Diffusion.

Hae-Joang, C. (2005). Reading the “Korean wave” as a sign of global shift. Korea Journal, 45(4), 147-182.

Choi, J. (2010). The South Korean film renaissance: Local hitmakers, global provocateurs. Wesleyan University Press.

Chua, B. H. (2012). Structure, audience and soft power in East Asian pop culture. Vol. 1. Hong Kong. Hong Kong University Press.

Cohen, R. (2008). Global diasporas: An introduction. London and New York. Routledge.

Cunningham, S., & Sinclair, J. (2001). Floating lives: The media and Asian diasporas. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Dator, J., & Seo, Y. (2004). Korea as the wave of a future. Journal of Futures Studies, 9(1), 31-44.

Denzin, N. K. (2017). Sociological methods: A sourcebook. London and New York. Routledge.

Department of Asiatic Languages and Literatures (2018). Presentation. Babes-Bolyai University. Retrieved 22 March 2022, from http://lett.ubbcluj.ro/departamente/departamentul-de-limbi-si-literaturi-asiatice/.

Department of Korean Studies (2018). Presentation. University of Bucharest. Retrieved 22 March 2022, from http://orientale.lls.unibuc.ro/home/coreeana/.

Du Gay, P, Evans, J., & Redman, P. (2000). Identity: A reader. London and New York. Sage.

Embassy of Romania in the Republic of Korea (2018). Brief history. Retrieved 30 March 2022, from http://seoul.mae.ro/en/node/393.

Hall, S., & Du Gay, P. (1996). Questions of cultural identity: SAGE publications. London and New York. Sage.

Holmes, J. (1997). Women, language and identity. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 1(2), 195-223. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00012

Iwabuchi, K. (2010). Undoing inter-national fandom in the age of brand nationalism. Mechademia, 5(1), 87-96.

Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York. NYU Press.

Jung, E. Y. (2009). Transnational Korea: A critical assessment of the Korean wave in Asia and the United States. Southeast review of Asian studies, 31, 69-80.

Jung, S. (2011). Korean masculinities and transcultural consumption: Yonsama, Rain, Oldboy, K-Pop Idols. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

Kang, Y. D. (2012). The First Year after the Korea-EU FTA and Its Prospects. Retrieved 1 April 2022 from www.kiep.go.kr.

Katz, E., & Liebes, T. (1985). Mutual aid in the decoding of Dallas: Preliminary notes from a cross-cultural study. In P. Drummond & Patterson, R. (Ed.) Television in Transition (pp. 187-198). London: British Film Institute.

Liebes, T., & Katz, E. (1986). Patterns of involvement in television fiction: A comparative analysis. European journal of communication, 1(2), 151-171. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323186001002004

KF Global E-school in Eurasia (2017). The Project. Retrieved 13 April 2022, from https://www.research.ed.ac.uk/en/projects/global-e-school-in-eurasia.

Kim, Y. (2008). Media consumption and everyday life in Asia. London and New York. Routledge.

Culture, Korean (2011). Information Service – The Korean Wave: A New Pop Culture Phenomenon. Contemporary Korea 1, Seoul.

Kpropro (2011).UTV scrie istorie in randul fanilor kpop. Kropropro. Retrieved 17 April 2022, from http://kpopro.wordpress.com/2011/03/31/pre/.

Lee, Keehyeung (2008). Mapping out the cultural politics of “the Korean Wave” in contemporary South Korea. In B. H. Chua & K. Iwabuchi (Eds.) East Asian pop culture: Analysing the Korean wave (pp. 175-191). Hong Kong. Hong Kong University Press.

Liebes, T., & Elihu, K. (1989). On the critical abilities of television viewers. In C. Newbold & O. Boyd-Barrett (Eds.). Approaches to media: A reader (pp. 204-222). London: Arnold.

Nye, J. S. (1991). Bound to lead: The changing nature of American power. Basic Books.

Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft power: The means to success in world politics. Public Affairs.

Pană, A. (2017). Cultura coreeană în România (Unpublished MA Disertation). University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.

Pleşu, A. (2009, August). Altfel de televiziune. Adevărul, pp. 2A.

Romanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs (2018). Republic of Korea - Bilateral affairs. Romanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Retrieved 23 March 2022, from http://www.mae.ro/bilateral-relations/2042#770.

Ryoo, W. (2008). The political economy of the global mediascape: the case of the South Korean film industry. Media, Culture & Society, 30(6), 873-889. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443708096098

Ryoo, W. (2009). Globalization, or the logic of cultural hybridization: The case of the Korean wave. Asian Journal of Communication, 19(2), 137-151. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292980902826427

Sandvoss, C. (2005). Fans: The mirror of consumption. Polity.

Shim, D. (2006). Hybridity and the rise of Korean popular culture in Asia. Media, Culture & Society, 28(1), 25-44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443706059278

Tada-Amnuaychai, M. (2006). Korean media industry and its cultural marketing strategy of K-pop. Chulalongkorn University.

Zimmerman, D. H. (1998). Identity, context and interaction. In C. Antaki & S. Widdicombe(Eds.), Identities in talk (pp. 87-106), London and New York: Sage.

Center for Open Access in Science