![]() |
Center for Open Access in Science (COAS) OPEN JOURNAL FOR STUDIES IN LINGUISTICS (OJSL) ISSN (Online) 2620-0678 * ojsl@centerprode.com |
Book Review on Language, Literacy and Learning in STEM Education Alex Acquah * ORCID: 0000-0001-5261-9532 Jonathan Odame * ORCID: 0000−0002-9522-3869 Elisabeth Akushia Antie * ORCID: 0009- 0002- 5028- 1413 Ebenezer Nkum * ORCID: 0000−0001−6130−396X Open Journal for Studies in Linguistics, 2023, 6(2), 59-68 * https://doi.org/10.32591/coas.ojsl.0602.03059a LICENCE: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. ARTICLE (Full Text - PDF) |
ABSTRACT: KEY WORDS: STEM Education, mathematics, language, literacy, learning, interdisciplinary. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: |
REFERENCES: Abedi, J. (2015). Language issues in item development. Handbook of Test Development. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203874776.ch17 Alrø, H., Skovsmose, O., & Valero, P. (2009). Inter-viewing foregrounds: Students’ motives for learning in a multicultural setting. Social Interactions in Multicultural Settings, 13-37. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087907174_003 Barton, B. (2008). The language of Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-72859-9 Beecher, M., & Sweeny, S. M. (2008). Closing the achievement gap with curriculum enrichment and differentiation: One school’s story. Journal of Advanced Academics, 19(3), 502-530. https://doi.org/10.4219/jaa-2008-815 Davis, B. (1997). Listening for differences: An evolving conception of mathematics teaching. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(3), 355-376. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.28.3.0355 Guetterman, T. C. (2020). Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods research sampling strategies. Education. https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199756810-0241 Gee, J. P. (2014). 2010. an introduction to discourse analysis. theory and method. 3rd edition. New York, London: Routledge, selected 2-10. The Discourse Studies Reader, 235-243. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.184.411gee Hashimov, E. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A methods sourcebook and the coding manual for qualitative researchers. Technical Communication Quarterly, 24(1), 109-112. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2015.975966 Hyde, J. S., Lindberg, S. M., Linn, M. C., Ellis, A. B., & Williams, C. C. (2008). Gender similarities characterize math performance. Science, 321(5888), 494-495. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1160364 Mahoney, K. (2017). The assessment of emergent bilinguals. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783097272 Morse, J. M. R. (1991). Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. Nursing Research, 40(2). https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-199103000-00014 Neuville, E., & Croizet, J.-C. (2007). Can salience of gender identity impair math performance among 7-8 years old girls? the moderating role of Task Difficulty. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 22(3), 307-316. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03173428 Ntenza, S. P. (2006). Investigating forms of children’s writing in grade 7 mathematics classrooms. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(3), 321-345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-5891-0 Sfard, A. (2007). When the rules of discourse change, but nobody tells you: Making sense of mathematics learning from a commognitive standpoint. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(4), 565-613. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400701525253 Skovsmose, O. (2002). Concerns of critical mathematics education – and of ethnomathematics. Revista Colombiana De Educación, (86), 361-378. https://doi.org/10.17227/rce.num86-13713 Van de gaer, E., Pustjens, H., Van Damme, J., & De Munter, A. (2008). Mathematics participation and mathematics achievement across secondary school: The role of gender. Sex Roles, 59(7-8), 568-585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9455-x Vithal, R., & Skovsmose, O. (1997). The end of innocence: A critique of ethnomathematics. Educational studies in mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 34(2), 131-157. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1002971922833 Yu, C. H. (2008). Book review: Creswell, J., & Plano Clark, V. (2007). designing and conducting mixed methods research. Organizational Research Methods, 12(4), 801-804. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428108318066
|
© Center for Open Access in Science