COAS
Center for Open Access in Science (COAS)
OPEN JOURNAL FOR STUDIES IN LINGUISTICS (OJSL)

ISSN (Online) 2620-0678 * ojsl@centerprode.com

OJSL Home

2023 - Volume 6 - Number 2


Book Review on Language, Literacy and Learning in STEM Education

Alex Acquah * ORCID: 0000-0001-5261-9532
University of Texas at El Paso, College of Education, El Paso, UNITED STATES

Jonathan Odame * ORCID: 0000−0002-9522-3869
University of Ghana, College of Education, Accra, GHANA

Elisabeth Akushia Antie * ORCID: 0009- 0002- 5028- 1413
University of Texas at El Paso, College of Liberal Arts, El Paso, UNITED STATES

Ebenezer Nkum * ORCID: 0000−0001−6130−396X
University of Texas at El Paso, College of Science, El Paso, UNITED STATES

Open Journal for Studies in Linguistics, 2023, 6(2), 59-68 * https://doi.org/10.32591/coas.ojsl.0602.03059a
Received: 24 January 2023 ▪ Revised: 20 July 2023 ▪ Accepted: 12 August 2023

LICENCE: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ARTICLE (Full Text - PDF)


ABSTRACT:
Language, Literacy, and Learning in STEM Education is a comprehensive examination of the role of language and literacy in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education. The book provides an in-depth look at the ways in which language and literacy skills impact student learning and achievement in STEM subjects, and offers practical strategies for addressing the linguistic and literate demands of STEM education. Through a combination of research, case studies, and practical examples, the book offers a valuable resource for educators looking to support the linguistic and literate development of their STEM students.

KEY WORDS: STEM Education, mathematics, language, literacy, learning, interdisciplinary.

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:
Alex Acquah, University of Texas at El Paso, College of Education, El Paso, UNITED STATES.


REFERENCES:

Abedi, J. (2015). Language issues in item development. Handbook of Test Development. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203874776.ch17

Alrø, H., Skovsmose, O., & Valero, P. (2009). Inter-viewing foregrounds: Students’ motives for learning in a multicultural setting. Social Interactions in Multicultural Settings, 13-37. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087907174_003

Barton, B. (2008). The language of Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-72859-9

Beecher, M., & Sweeny, S. M. (2008). Closing the achievement gap with curriculum enrichment and differentiation: One school’s story. Journal of Advanced Academics, 19(3), 502-530. https://doi.org/10.4219/jaa-2008-815

Davis, B. (1997). Listening for differences: An evolving conception of mathematics teaching. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(3), 355-376. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.28.3.0355

Guetterman, T. C. (2020). Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods research sampling strategies. Education. https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199756810-0241

Gee, J. P. (2014). 2010. an introduction to discourse analysis. theory and method. 3rd edition. New York, London: Routledge, selected 2-10. The Discourse Studies Reader, 235-243. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.184.411gee

Hashimov, E. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A methods sourcebook and the coding manual for qualitative researchers. Technical Communication Quarterly, 24(1), 109-112. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2015.975966

Hyde, J. S., Lindberg, S. M., Linn, M. C., Ellis, A. B., & Williams, C. C. (2008). Gender similarities characterize math performance. Science, 321(5888), 494-495. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1160364

Mahoney, K. (2017). The assessment of emergent bilinguals. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783097272

Morse, J. M. R. (1991). Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. Nursing Research, 40(2). https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-199103000-00014

Neuville, E., & Croizet, J.-C. (2007). Can salience of gender identity impair math performance among 7-8 years old girls? the moderating role of Task Difficulty. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 22(3), 307-316. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03173428

Ntenza, S. P. (2006). Investigating forms of children’s writing in grade 7 mathematics classrooms. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(3), 321-345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-5891-0

Sfard, A. (2007). When the rules of discourse change, but nobody tells you: Making sense of mathematics learning from a commognitive standpoint. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(4), 565-613. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400701525253

Skovsmose, O. (2002). Concerns of critical mathematics education – and of ethnomathematics. Revista Colombiana De Educación, (86), 361-378. https://doi.org/10.17227/rce.num86-13713

Van de gaer, E., Pustjens, H., Van Damme, J., & De Munter, A. (2008). Mathematics participation and mathematics achievement across secondary school: The role of gender. Sex Roles, 59(7-8), 568-585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9455-x

Vithal, R., & Skovsmose, O. (1997). The end of innocence: A critique of ethnomathematics. Educational studies in mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 34(2), 131-157. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1002971922833
Wilcox, B., & Monroe, E. E. (2011). Integrating writing and Mathematics. The Reading Teacher, 64(7), 521-529. https://doi.org/10.1598/rt.64.7.6

Yu, C. H. (2008). Book review: Creswell, J., & Plano Clark, V. (2007). designing and conducting mixed methods research. Organizational Research Methods, 12(4), 801-804. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428108318066

© Center for Open Access in Science